Search results

No, because I am a scientist. I am not a civil or structural engineer. So I speak to them and they assure me that the towers could have collapsed due to the internal damage caused by both the impact and the burning fuel. Please explain to me why I should believe a wingnut like you instead of...

I am. Degree level applied physics to be precise. Which is why I know the bollocks colinz has dribbled about newtonian mechanics is utter utter shite. I also hold a pilots licence. Which is why i know the drivvle spouted about the planes is utter utter shite. I speak regularly to a civil...

Despise him, always have done. He is one of the managers in the game most known to like to receive his communications in large brown envellopes. Bent as a terry venables.

Actually technically it's entering the UK you do not need a passport for. If you are a UK citizen/subject and have proof of identity then it is up to immigration to prove you do not have right of entry - or it certainly used to be. Several years ago I was at a motorcycle rally in Belgium and...

No, no, no. Colinz wasn't there, knows noone who WAS there, has read some bad science on a conspiracy website and misunderstood it, spoke to someone who doesn't fully understand aviation theory and misunderstood the little he heard. He OBVIOUSLY knows more about the subject than any mere eye...

Nope, I and others have quite clearly illustrated your lack of knowledge and understanding BEFORE moving on to attacking yourself as a moron. Ergo, not ad hominem. Nope, in the hope that you can actually movve away from your childish understanding of science and begin to function in the real...

Ahh, so in a sideways way you finally answered him. You would tell his siter in law she is lying and a bad actor. Well at least we know. Now f*** off and die moron. And I've not read any other shite you have posted anywhere, on this board or elsewhere. There is nothing you can teach me...

The relevance is another favourite load of bollocks peddaled by the conspiracy nutters. That there were no employees in the centres that day and that over time all the offices had been emptied and the companies had moved out but the buildings were kept on as a sham by the US government and the...

There are no forces. Don't you understand Newton's laws of motion. They discus would not be on the earth so gravity and other forces would not apply.

There we go, the fall back of all nutters when shown up to be the deluded fools they are. Unable to argue their points using real science instead of the made up shite they have read (and failed to understand) on their conspiracy boards you fall back to the ad hominem. At that point you have...

No. You have been 'got' on your lack of understanding of Newtonian mechanics, specifically the 3 laws of motion. You have been 'got' on your lack of understanding of structural mechanics and building design and integrity. You have been 'got' on your lack of understanding of the principles of...

Where did I say that? The fact that you brought the performance of aircraft at sea level into farce of your misunderstanding and were soundly humilated by someone who actually knows the theory and practice should tell you something about the standard of your understanding. No, more selective...

First accurate statement you've written in this entire thread.

A classic example of someone with little knowledge jumping to an erroneous conclusion based on flawed reasoning. The reason that jets fly at high altitude it that the engines are more efficient when flying high. It has nothing to do with the performance of the airframe which is the main...

Oh god, so now you are an expert on flying and aircraft as well. Do you have a pilots licence colinz? I do. You are wrong. What you are referring to is straight and level flight in ideal conditions. Additionally I believe that the 360 kts you are no doubt referring to is what is called Vno...

You seem to have missed the bit where I asked "How would the pictrure HAVE to be a fake based on third law of newtonian mechanics?" So I've reposted it so you can get a chance to see it this time and try to answer.

Explain that then. How would the pictrure HAVE to be a fake based on third law of newtonian mechanics? Care to tell us where the picture came from by the way.

Except, of course, you don't really understand the third law (or the first or second for that matter) and you certainly don't understand relatavistic mechanics or the mechanincs and science of space travel.

Erm, not quite. If we are being REALLY picky then it is highly likely, in fact almost certain, that close to or at the event horizon the classical model breaks down. It is also almost certain that quantum physics breaks down. So Newtonian mechanics do not apply at or near the surface of a...

Why is it that so many religious people seem so fundamentally f***ing stupid and are unable to understand basic scientific concepts? Is it that their stupidity makes them more susceptible to the falsehoods inherent in religion or is it their religion that shuts their minds to intelligent...