Search results

See my post above. :)

That's not true. Leave was ahead twice in March 2018 and it's been an even split a few times as well (as recently as 11th February). There's also lots of don't knows. https://whatukthinks.org/eu/questions/if-a-second-eu-referendum-were-held-today-how-would-you-vote/

I like that idea if it comes to it. It does not really split the votes in a way that disadvantages Leave or Remain, so it's fair. I imagine however that if there is another vote, we'll get something worse than that.

I know. That's what I was describing. It confirms what I said.

Maybe there could also be a choice for if we Leave, what kind of Leave would you prefer (probably maximum of two choices so as not to split votes by three or more). But perhaps that's too complicated.

Yes it can. Yes they do. Had they they voted for Norway+ or a customs union (or even abstained in the case of the latter), those motions would have had a majority. Of course you can look at other options and move the numbers around and come up with different arguments too. The DUP voted against...

The same could be said for TIG, Greens (CL) and some of the Lib Dems (and Tories + Labour) - want a second referendum and trying to force it through by voting against Common Market 2.0/Norway+ and Customs Union.

The polls are all over the place. 1112107560222511110 1112107512478736385

1111172769956458497

I don't believe this. I think he would have won. He has huge support. Huge grassroots support too, which matters a lot when campaigning with the election funding system they have over there. A far better candidate for many Americans than Hilary ever was, who many seemed to view as the least...

Seems to be doing alright: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47319111

We didn't have a good record with him in the side either. As good as he was, I find it hard to say he is one of our best ever players when he didn't really help the team do better than they would have otherwise done. Part of that is down to how he was implemented into the team, I think. We...

Give Google's support line a call and get a replacement sent to you. There's a two year warranty on the phone.

So what was the point of that statement? Did she say anything new?

I would be very surprised if the EU did not manage to convince countries which were considering a veto not so do so. But I've been wrong before and I'm sure I'll be wrong again!

I'm pretty sure someone asked him whether it was possible to pass something to over-ride the convention after he made the announcement, and he said yes.

She can bring her deal for a third vote. There are ways around the Speaker's intervention: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47623589 And the EU would grant an extension if they thought there was a chance the deal would be passed. They don't want a no deal situation. What strikes me as...

You are only here to argue and to insult. You admit you do not want to persuade nor do you want to be persuaded. It is clear any further discussions are a pointless exercise. All the best :thumbsup:

And so the theme continues... You can enlighten me. You know best. Others are wrong. Inferring I am slow in mind. Attack, attack, attack. That'll help us progress, won't it?

It doesn't matter what context you use, using the word relative makes no sense if you are saying the majority are thick.