Interesting selection. Good performance so far, build up a bit slow but overall pretty good. Would be nice to have seen though two 50:50 pens even. Suspect we’ll be under more pressure soon
Boris is out of his depth surrounded by a largely mediocre government ministers rewarded for their views on Brexit rather than competency. We have been hugely unlucky as a population over the last couple of years is one way of looking at it
Yes, we can’t and shouldn’t refuse. The sacrifices being made by everyone is so severe though it would be great if people did what they could (and thanks btw :thumbsup:)
Read today in FT that vitamin d is really helpful
“It is clear that the existing medical literature on the crucial role of...
Agree that the facts show that if you are obese or overweight you’d are more likely to get seriously ill and that there is a risk the nhs won’t be able to cope (although mitigated in part now the nightingale hospitals are now ready, one of the few successes of this shambolic govt). But there is...
Not to your specific Q, but the allocation of scarce resource to our health service Vs other activity is by itself a life and death decision which the government make on our behalf
Fair point but it would be good that the government reviewed that and other options and were clearer on why they are choosing the path they are. There are other options than the Hokey Cokey, e.g. the New Zealand that means ****ing getting on it, full lockdown long enough to kills it, managing...
The government should be financially supporting the economy far more so than now, that takes some heat out of the situation. I wouldn’t have changed the previous furlough scheme, and I now would find ways to support some of those excluded such as the self employed. I say this from a typical...
Agree there is no good way out and we need to find the least worst route out. By the nature and scale of the problem people will have different experiences, expectations and views on an exit. I’m not saying my opinion of a potential different path is right but I would like to see all main...
You keep repeating “getting back to normality”, I didn’t say that but whatever.
You use the word vulnerable, that is undefined and can be used to make the sweeping statements. Genuine question, and it may be 12m to 15m, but what is the population of the clinically extremely vulnerable...
Sure, there is different guidance for those clinically extremely vulnerable. I don’t believe it’s compulsory. As you say, it’s advice. If we were to be more restrictive then the support for that section of our society would need to be massively stepped up