Search results

Diverting again..do you have evidence of the fact that Hillary's server was smashed up? Really looney, it is OK to admit that you were wrong.

Yes but you said: "The facts that hillary had a private sevrerm which was acid washed and smashed up" and so far have given me (disputed) references to two laptops being destroyed and a number of emails being deleted - leaving aside acid washed which seems to mean whatever you and Trump decide -...

I haven't swallowed any media guff at all - the question is not whether Trump should be taken literally or what I believe but whether you have any evidence to back up your claim (in a post stating that you believed in evidence) that it was a "fact" that Hillary's server was acid washed and...

Splitting hairs? There is nothing in there about a server being acid washed or destroyed, just the already accepted fact that emails had been deleted. Still no evidence to support your "facts"...

Oh come on looney, for someone who claims to believe in evidence that is extraordinarily weak. You claimed the following" You have linked to an unsourced report that the FBI allowed two of Clinton's aides to have their laptops destroyed. There is no reference to a private server being...

Why is that obtuse? You say "combining a group of people with a high suicide rate with a career that has a high suicide rate is absolutely ridiculous and is not in the best interest of anybody." I point out that men as a group have a high suicide rate (much higher than the average) and so from...

No, I asked you what evidence you had for it. You claimed that it was a "fact" that it had happened. So what evidence do you have for the "fact" that Hillary's server was acid-washed and then broken up?

OK - I'll bite. As a fan of evidence - what do you mean by "acid-washed" and what evidence do you have that this was done to Hillary's server?

Men have much higher suicide rates than women, so by your argument we should not let men join the forces...

And another one.

The finishing positions tend to correspond most closely with the amount spent on wages rather than the amount spent on transfers (although the two are not unrelated) - paying existing, proven players more money to keep them at the club tends to be a much better use of money than splashing out on...

Also Casablanca for 1

Just two words: Andy Carroll

Of the players no longer at the club, they lost money on all of them apart from Modric... 2 Roberto Soldado £25.50m - 10m (15.5m loss) 5 Darren Bent £21.04m - 16.5m (4.5m loss) 7 David Bentley £18.70m - released (18.7m loss) 8 Luka Modric £17.85m - 30m (12.15 m gain) 9 Paulinho £16.77m - 9.9m...

Interesting article in the Observer that says that Spurs buy particularly badly when they splash the cash...although they certainly sell well. https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2017/jul/22/dele-alli-harry-kane-tottenham-football-silly-season This is a list of their top 12 all time...

This certainly used to be true but the major supermarket chains are fighting back strongly and there is now much less difference apart from on the things that Lidl/Aldi specialise in and source for the whole empire - like bratwurst and pickles. Being a Hillian, I shop mainly at Lidl, Waitrose...

Ex-England egg-ball-chaser Brian Moore - particularly when people tell him to stick to rugby and not bother himself with politics.

Another vote for Fantastic Mister Fox. The triumph of the of the working class aginst the decadent powers of capitalist land-owners (for jonny.rainbow )

Tomori Never Comes?

But if you collate different versions of the same name then you will find that Jack, Jake and Jacob are well ahead of all the Mo's.