Search results

Tom, there is nothing in your post that refutes my post. As I said, the materials were either not to spec (cost cutting) or the spec was wrong (negligence)

???

I thought you didn't need clarification as you can interpret what people really mean?

All the politicising of this tradegy is really quite tiresome, and grubby. It's down to building regs. The materials were either not up to specification or the specification was wrong.

Tyre pressure.

Are you a lorry driver?

Never heard of him.

I’ve lost count of the amount of Local Authority Tenders I’ve put together now, the last page always explains how the Tender is weighted, costs always being 50%. It doesn’t ever surprise me though that the eventual winner is the one who comes in with the lowest cost.

Opened it, read it takes 20 minutes, closed it.

Yeah your right, pure speculation on my part, probably not helpful.

Just a thought: Could it be that the company who actually made the cladding was and not the company who fitted it be at fault here?

So when I stated Insulation, I was right, or more accurately the bloke on TV was.

Can we keep it civil do you think?

I'll write a strongly worded email to sky news then.

Sounds feasible to me, although I rather liked the idea of it being, well you know, them.

Not sure why it amuses you, bloke on the news tonight talking about it.

Give us a clue then where I can. They were still talking about insulation this evening.

Insulation?

https://phys.org/news/2017-06-wow-mystery-space.html Here you go.