Search results

Lol. Where did I say that Abramovich invested in Chelsea for fun? Here's a clue, I didn't. Where did anyone mention why the Premier League was created? Here's another clue, nobody did. All I did was point out that there is a difference between the ill gotten gains of a Russian oligarch...

I'm not looking to deflect from anything. Which part of this post are you struggling to understand?

The Gallipot Inn is in Hartfield not Upper Hartfield.

Well nobody called Harris does. Or anyone who name rhymes with Harris does, or even anyone who'se name has any humorous link with the name Harris. Jeez. Are you 12?

I lived there for 20 odd years before moving down here to Dorset. It was a fantastic place back then and I still return a couple of times a year to meet up with old friends. I used to live directly opposite the Anchor.

Well I'm not an idiot so what do you think? I can see little, if any, positives coming from their investment other than an acceleration in the development of Selhurst. But at what cost? One question for you if I may? Do you really think that calling Harris and Blitzer, Dancer and Blitzen is...

Are you seriously suggesting that multi billionaire Abramovich bought chelsea because he had seen the profits to be had from tv revenues in 2003? The same bloke who said "I’m looking at it as something to have fun with rather than having to realize a return. I don’t look at this as a financial...

But not on the Albion Ale

I fear it's you that looks a tit with that response. For your information I have never trolled these boards, ever. Feel free to quote an example when I have done. Do you ever actually offer anything of value to this forum?

Hypocrisy? You do realise that there is something of a difference between the dubiously obtained wealth of a Russian oligarch being pumped into a single club and that obtained by all premier teams through legitimate TV deals?

Which funnily enough equates to two years of Brighton's losses. Let's be honest, the only difference is that your sugar daddy is considerably richer than our sugar daddy was. The level of overspend is comparable. Back on topic, the cost of players and the wages being spent at the top is...

You consider losing £18 million a year to be merely a financial challenge?

You don't really think that's what narly101 meant do you?

Under a fiver to watch a premier league game? Fantastic value. :)

Signed despite being one of the "Croydon lot".

So why do you think they have been introduced if it's not to reduce the clubs losses?

Surely he is, these cost cutting measures are designed to do reduce debt. So what other reason might there be for these "penny pinching" measures? Which part of losing £18 million pounds a year being an unsustainable business model are you struggling to understand?

Hangeland left Palace at the end of last season and believes the time is right to call time on his playing career. "I've thought long and hard about the future and decided it's time to end it," he told Sky Sports. "So I'm announcing my retirement after a long time and half of that time in this...

Stephen Bloom. Any relation?

Circa £675m in 2015 https://companycheck.co.uk/company/04241161/BET365-GROUP-LIMITED/financial-accounts