Search results

I think you may have a problem with your keyboard as you seem to be repeating yourself ? \My answer hasn't changed :thumbsup: :bigwave:

But you must be able to see that releasing a corpse after a miscarriage of justice and a mistaken death sentence could be .......... problematic ??? All those people that Ian Hislop pointed out would have been mistakenly killed before the miscarriage was discovered.

It really isn't complex. It's not a deterrent and innocent people will be killed, proven time and time again, so no logical reason at all :shrug: But revenge ? And revenge carried out in the name of complete strangers ? I think you may have something there ???

I think it's fairly clear. I'm against it because it has been factually proven that it is not a deterrent and it would result in innocent people being killed, time and time again, so there is no reason for it and many reasons against it. You obviously agree that it is not a deterrent and...

Yes you've made it clear that you want 'an eye for an eye' and people killed. Because you've made it blindingly obvious that you have nothing to say about the simple facts that it is not a deterrent and innocent people will be killed :shrug:

I only posted this a page ago but you obviously didn't read that far back or remember, so here are cases where it is 'cut and dried'

OK, apart from Jake Forster-Caskey Colin Kazim-Richards Gifton Noel-Williams Kazenga Lua-Lua Benicio Baker-Boaitey Imari Hines-Samuels Tom Dallison-Lisbon Ben Clark-Eden Jordan Maguire-Drew Tyler Hornby-Forbes Ali Al-Habsi Jack Rowe-Hurst Chris Cumming-Bart and Craig Mackail-Smith What have...

Took Mrs Wz up Dewsbury-Hall for the weekend. She was NOT impressed :glare:

Well I've donated a FEW quid Enrest, but if your ARS is not on that ZIP wire from the WSU for the palace MATCH, I demand a REFUND :wink:

And that's not claiming it's a deterrent :facepalm: Here's a couple of very simple facts. The death penalty does not deter people from killing. If you have the Death Penalty you will kill innocent people. If your blood lust overrides those two facts then fine. But at least have the balls to...

It isn't a deterrent. I assume you have access to the Internet. It's a simple fact that has been proven over and over again when comparing places that have corporal punishment and those that don't. Maybe have a little look before calling people's posts 'dumb'. Just trying to help :thumbsup:

It's so well documented that I won't even bother with the overwhelming evidence that the death penalty is not a deterrent in any shape or form. I'm sure even you're capable of finding that on Google. But, maybe you should watch this. Because as the 1st Earl of Birkenhead famously said...

Wee Billy Gordon Greer Jamie Murphy Gordon Smith Alex Dawson Kit Napier Who else ?

And propper analysis :thumbsup:

Well you could tell us why you continue to support this current cabal ? Or you could continue with your 'witty' snipes at anyone who calls them out, which are always so popular on NSC . It's your call, as always :wink:

Now if ever there was an absolute slam/dunk for a Conservative Prime Minister, it would be cutting a recently privatised industries commitments to levels of service for the benefit of it's newly acquired shareholders. It's the absolute definition of the current cabal's whole purpose. But he is...

Sorry but any post you make without 'mincing', 'strippers', 'cockatiel' or varieties of pub based snacks is always a bit of a disappointment :down:

As if there was ever any doubt :lolol:

I tape it every episode (on that series thing), often start to watch it and fall asleep, and then maybe watch it back on a Sunday morning and occasionally fall asleep again. If I think I'm going to fall asleep I fast forward though all the 'analysis' stuff. Probably see between 30-80% of it...

The save is when the postie only has to do that journey once every three days. That's how to employ less people (which if you're struggling to get staff is a way to circumvent the problem) and get more profit out of the fewer people that you do employ. Otherwise you would have to use taxpayers...