But do people see it differently ? Does anyone really get enough mail to justify more than 2/3 deliveries a week ? And from the moment it was privatised, of course it has to be run for profit for the shareholders, just like all the other privatised infrastructure like electricity, gas, water...
I really can't see the problem with RM going to 2/3 days a week deliveries. Is there really any possible justification for sending a person to every address in the UK every day in 2024 with the amount of actual mail and so many ways to get things delivered urgently :shrug:
I'm a dog owner for a week. My daughter and her partner are coming back from Australia after nearly 2 years there and they are stopping off at Thailand for a week, so we picked him up from Heathrow Airport this morning
Does that mean we've gone full circle back to centre backs and there are tons of 16/17 year old fullbacks and DMs in the academy about to break through :wink:
It can indeed, but nobody will take the financial loss to set up the bottling, bottling plants etc for a non-existent market that has now been 'opened up'
Seems somewhat appropriate :dunce:
There does seem to be a growing idea that if we elect Starmer it negates all the other really f***ing stupid stuff we've done over the last few years :facepalm:
I need cheering up, so am off to the Amex :bigwave:
Or indeed, anyone else who works in that entire industry :facepalm:
I think you have confused being a **** with being in a certain industry.
It's really quite simple, lots of industries have ***s in them, lots of people in financial planning aren't ****s.
@Steve Foster is simply a **** and...
Don't think there will be a referendum, what's the point. That deal took 40+ years of hard negotiation by politicians of all parties and we'll never get back close to the position of power we were in before we threw it all away.
The Trade and Cooperation Agreement is due for it's first review...