Search results

In a two-horse race. Done and dusted. Oh. Trump will win then.

:lol: Just watching this on a binge-fest. Just started the last season. She does indeed have a face like a sheep's!

Reading the piece it seems as though SCCC’s contribution was a wreath and asking the volunteer historian to turn up.

Thanks. I hadn’t realised that the 300k lead referred to GA. The next few days (weeks if the lawyers get involved) are going to be pretty ugly.

Which, in a nutshell, is...?

That suggests that if we score two goals we’re going down. ‘Don’t score more than one unless you can be sure of scoring a third’ is presumably the message that Potter is giving.

AZ & PA seem critical... is that right? Just getting up to speed with what’s been going on.

Cut it out please.

Brilliant player, not so much as a human being.

Blow me down. My memory badly let me down there. Apologies beorhthelm

There was a Democrat House in 2016 too...

This. You would think that positioning BDB just beyond the back post would have the same result but a) he doesn’t go there, and b) quite often we don’t beat the first man, making this strategy redundant.

You don’t mention whether you’ve tried turning it off and on again. I’d try that.

While I’d agree that neither are proven (and I didn’t claim either were), I think that ‘fringe science’ is a bit of a push when Scientific American reckons that simulation theory is roughly 50/50. Unproven, yes; profound implications, yes; a plausible theory worthy of consideration, yes imo.

It’s absolutely not a conspiracy theory, as you say. My post was a response to another user’s post dissing the theory; I was merely providing a counter argument.

That was one of them, yes.

Computer simulation: an age-old hypothesis, dating back to at least Plato’s cave allegory. Recent philosophical research really kicked into gear on the back of Prof Nick Bostrom’s 2003 paper (https://academic.oup.com/pq/article-abstract/53/211/243/1610975), and has been assessed by Scientific...

Hat.........>......... decapitated statue.

I take it that it didn't win? Oh well.

Yep, I agree. As in so many areas though, the actions of the few have consequences for the many. In some cases for the better (BoB, for example), in some for the worse (CV-19, for example).