Should I have tried to explain by saying that I didn’t know with which person the correct answer would be associated with?
Or just try harder in the future? :D
I used it with regard to which of us would be proved correct, hence the possessive form. If I’m wrong to use it in that way on here then so be it, i’ll try harder next time to meet the NSC grammar rules. :D
We are back to square one. :)
I’ll say it again, I think Zaha will gain from VAR, whilst most on here think he’ll get booked more often for diving. Whose right? Nobody knows yet.
We will know whose right this time next year. Feel free to bump this post if I’m wrong.
Thank you for that but, again, I’ve no idea why this is even relevant when the post I queried claimed that Zaha had received the most bookings for simulation in the history of the Prem, not since any other random date.
Thanks but, whilst the ‘request on Desktop’ message came up, it still didn’t show the tweet.
I quoted Bozza again and saw the tweet number so I’ve now read the tweet. So it was for one year then?
I promise you I’m not looking for any form of high ground, I’m fully aware he received 3 cards for simulation in a single season, joint highest with Dele Alli iirc. I asked because I wasn’t aware of the claim I questioned.
Well at least VAR will decide who’s right next season, which was exactly my point.
Could you provide a source to your claim that “Zaha had the most cards for simulation of any player in Prem history” only my search skills are obviously poor as I can’t find any reference to that claim anywhere...
Agee completely, we’ve evolved to the point where our own actions will probably wipe mankind out. The planet will continue and other life forms will evolve to take advantage of what’s left.
Maybe, but I think Zaha will win a shed more penalties when VAR is implemented. I think he gets genuine penalty calls turned down because he’s perceived as a diver, VAR, if used properly, will answer that question once and for all. I think he’ll win more, I guess you disagree.
I’d add that, if...