Search results

I would not be surprised if we see interest from a major club, but it wouldn't be a total shock if he said no, still got a contract and a job to do at Brighton. Could also see Barber talking him into leaving, as £10m opposed to nothing at the end of his contract, if he wont extend, would...

Yeah, they should run away to Britain away and live in Salisbury, Putin cant touch them there.

What about the fees they got for Zaha, Butland, Milivojevic, and Guaita?

Chelsea are not involved in any UEFA competition, so maybe they are not considered in this report? Edit. I see Tottenham in there, so not that.

Seeing Queen Elizabeth in "Examples of what can be entered" has unnerved me.

Yeah, was wondering if he had an umpire present, to confirm penetration, or if he just had the female confirm the act was done to their son or brother.

If you were a Billionaire Paedophile, you would defo have an amusement Park in your back garden.

Missed a trick, could have made money and opened them up for sponsorship, like football stadiums are. Coca Cola would have been good, shortened to Coke line. Foxtons Estate Agents, shortened to the Flat line. B.T., The Telephone Line. Persil, The washing line. Then sponsors for the canals too...

This is the firm that did the El Capitan mural. https://highrisemurals.media/about

I got one last year, it was called "Breadcrumbs" the birds loved it.

Perhaps I could have phrased it better, I was not trying to say it clearly wasn't antisemitic I was trying to say it is not clear that it was. I hope that has cleared that up.

He didn't make that up himself though. He had read that claim and repeated it, and apologised when told it was without evidence. It also is not clearly antisemitic, America has had similar accusations about the 9/11 attacks. There does seem to be evidence of intelligence not being effectively...

At the risk of Clem Fandango getting irate, didnt the Mail report his comments made at a particular meeting, which he then apologised for, and the next day reported other comments that he had made previously which were considered to be worse? I mean it wasn't a change of mind on the same...

I am sure Starmer does believe Israel has a right to defend itself, pretty sure he would also be a bit more critical of the way they are going about it currently though, if he didn't have a right wing press gagging for him to say something they can cite as antisemitic or supportive of...

If it was accepted that apartheid and genocide was in action, you would have a fair point. It isn't, but neither are the allegations entirely baseless. The apartheid allegation is tricky because within Israel, it certainly is not true, however, the subjugation of the populations in the West Bank...

Oh I see, it's not using the word ceasefire that makes him pro an Israeli genocide. Right, the issue with that is the semantics we have gotten into, where ceasefire meant Israel must stop all actions in Gaza, regardless of what Hamas are doing that day. That isn't reasonable. It would be...

I don't think anyone feels that Hamas attack on Israel was acceptable. But they are a terrorist organisation, it is expected that they will use terror tactics. Israel is a democratic state, a nation we trade with, have diplomatic relations with, sell arms to, and to some extent share...

He isn't, but he isn't able to criticise Israeli actions as strongly as he might, due to papers like the Mail being ready to jump on it. This isn't a problem in his party, its a problem in the press.

When Starmer gets a big problem in his Party that isn't a Daily Mail plot.

Apart from Palestine not being a recognised state, Hamas is recognised as a terrorist organisation.