Search results

Yes because it would be HILARIOUS. I'd also, to show my genuine fondness, give him the clap.

It might be "Chelsea Reserves", but their starting 11 cost around £500M.

It's also already deeply red, so more Republicans isn't going to rock the seesaw...

With all those incomers, there's little chance of them living in their own private Idaho...

Bridge to Wales...?

Yes, it appears to include our 4-1 DRUBBING of palace, plus Man City, who could only manage 4-2.

Whilst this seems to be the most common criticism levelled at them/Glasner, their defence isn't really the problem. They've only conceded 11 goals so far - that's only one more than each of Villa, Albion or Chelsea have, in league positions 4, 5 and 6 respectively. Their real problem is that in...

:shrug: I went to B&Q, Burgess Hill, yesterday. I got wood. :thumbsup:

Best Man beat you to it?

You mean "not orange"...?

You joke, but in the last 10 seasons the team finishing 18th (so beatable with goal difference) has had: 26 34 35 28 34 34 33 34 37 35 "40 points for safety" is a nonsense (sorry @Giraffe).

Printing money.

...if by "Europe-bound" you mean their season is quickly going south...

He's British when he's doing well; Scottish when doing badly. :thumbsup:

Who's Gary Wanderer, and why's the football club named after him? :shrug:

Is that before or after their football match? Or during?

I know, right? Two weeks tomorrow!

But comparing starting lineup costs, as I did in the other thread, it's of course bollocks...

That is: shots of Yaxley-Lennon cracking his head open.

That's a stupid statement.