Search results

I love being seen by women as a sexual object personally.

You only get 2 years if you’re relegated after 1 season. However the payments in season 3 are relatively low. It’s based on a percentage of guaranteed TV income for the Premier League teams. First year is approx 45m; second is 35m and third (if applicable) is a mere 15m (all approximate).

Something for the perma offended snowflakes to get their teeth into this morning I suppose. Who actually cares about women’s football anyway? The Albion women’s team could be having a game in the local park 2 minutes from my house and I’d not bother watching.

Anal lube.

Team was published by club’s official Twitter exactly an hour before KO, as usual.

I can’t see him being missed.

You seem to have been on NSC long enough to have grasped that HB&B is universally regarded as NSC’s biggest bellend - if you didn’t realise this, check out the tags on any of his threads. Therefore, a guess that it starts with a C and rhymes with hunt might be a good start.

How about recognition that one fan has been funding our losses for every year up until this one? £40m last year alone, which is over £1300 extra per season ticket if you wanted to break even for one season.

Last year it was around 40% of income. It’ll be <10% of our income this year. Next year, with about 45m parachute payment, it’ll still only be about 17-18%.

Firstly, tell your son to stop telling you porkies. The last mention of Cairney in relation to Brighton or BHAFC was back in summer 2017. Secondly, get yourself a Twitter account; you will absolutely love it.

No they aren’t. And you’re speaking to yourself again.

If we’re relegated we’ll still receive around 100m in TV money alone this season, which added to the increased value of sponsorship and advertising, plus the usual 12-13m from ticket sales, will give an income in the region of 120-130m. Parachute payments of 45m and 35m in seasons 1 and 2 after...

They’ll not want to leave unless a Premier League club comes in for them. Even leaving aside the fact that they’re all on 3-4 year contracts, I can only see Dunk and Groß being sold.

He’s not a gambler; he takes calculated risks. There’s a big difference.

There’s been some decent performances, but no-one in our squad has been consistently good in the first 5 months to warrant a big offer from another team.

Who would you drop from our current starting 11 to make way for him?

Yes. And Pritchard got subbed off after about 55 mins due to being completely ineffective.

The same transfer window that we'd signed Bruno, Kuzczak, Spanish Dave, Orlandi, Crofts and Wayne Bridge on a season loan. It wasn't that bad, was it?

d) Timmy Hodges writes some incomprehensible and badly punctuated shit about it just to let us know that he was there and try and give the impression that he's important.

Why do people keep trotting this myth out? Apart from last season, when we didn't need to change much with 51 points from 23 when the window opened, we have made significant signings in every Jan window since 2013: Ulloa, Stephens, Kayal, Knockaert, Sidwell were all Jan signings,