Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Donald Trump, US President

Who will win the 2024 Presidential Election?

  • President Joe Biden - Democrat

    Votes: 3 0.7%
  • Donald Trump - Republican

    Votes: 175 42.3%
  • Vice President, Kamala Harris - Democrat

    Votes: 216 52.2%
  • Other Democratic candidate tbc

    Votes: 20 4.8%

  • Total voters
    414
  • Poll closed .








A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
21,784
Deepest, darkest Sussex
I don't recall as big an appeaser to fascist dictatorships as Trump since 1938 - and that didn't go well either.
It’s time for me to get on my unpopular but personal favourite history hobby horse, named “In defence of Neville Chamberlain”.

Comparing the two does a massive disservice to Chamberlain. He may have been naive in thinking peace could happen, but he was also entirely pragmatic. He knew it was important to buy the UK time, and he set in motion the massive rearmament programme which the UK embarked upon from 1937. Those aren’t the actions of a man entirely under the spell of Hitler or blind to the possible outcomes and realities the UK faced. Chamberlain has gone down in history as a figure of ridicule, but this is entirely unfair. Even Churchill at the time was largely supportive of the course of action and Chamberlain served in his war cabinet (at Churchill’s personal request) until his death in 1940.

Whereas Trump is an arrogant, naive, venal, arrogant, self-serving, thick as pig shit, weird, ignorant, moronic, jumped up, racist POS.
 




Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
17,034
And Starmer would have got on his hands and knees sucking up to trump yesterday
The UK isn't at war. Completely different scenario. Starmer was playing the game yesterday, which was applauded and respected by people on both 'sides'.
 






astralavi

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2017
515
The Trump administration is considering (will if does not sign deal) ending all ongoing shipments of military aid to Ukraine after a meeting between Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Donald Trump in the Oval Office, the Washington Post reports.

The decision, if taken, would apply to billions of dollars of radars, vehicles, ammunition and missiles awaiting shipment to Ukraine through the presidential drawdown authority, the outlet reports, citing a senior US official.
 


Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
17,034
Why .... We all know what trump is like
Yeah - full of shit. Zelensky hasn't actually lost anything, because there was no guarantee of peace anyway!
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
19,163
Payment cards (Amex, visa, master, etc), operating systems, google, youtube, comcast corp (sky, etc), big pharma, food industry, clothing brands, film & tv industry,.... the list is endless....
Yep its going to take a while and I might not be able to do everything but I can't keep supporting these ****s.
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,080
Hurst Green
Painful watch but zelensky seemed to come in with the wrong attitude. This was so predictable. He should be on his hands and knees like starmer.
Oh do grow a brain. This man is a leader, a real leader that has taken on a **** and now he has another **** to deal with.
 




Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
17,034
What bit is wrong.

Ukraine need USA

Zelensky needed to come in with the attitude that will appease trump.

It's not rocket science.

I'm not pro trump or zelensky. And this is my view I don't care whether it's popular on here.
That bit.
 


deletebeepbeepbeep

Well-known member
May 12, 2009
22,217
The Ukraine thing is undoubtedly a very low, very public demonstration of the venal arrogance of Trump and his circle.

But intervening in Romanian affairs to save the Tates, as petty as it is, was the moment where I puked in my mouth. Using state power to lean on a foreign government to save some sex trafficker and rapist because his grossly misogynistic worldview gels with Trump's agenda is a real tell of the lows this government is going to sink to. A true "f*** you" moment.
 






Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
It’s time for me to get on my unpopular but personal favourite history hobby horse, named “In defence of Neville Chamberlain”.

Comparing the two does a massive disservice to Chamberlain. He may have been naive in thinking peace could happen, but he was also entirely pragmatic. He knew it was important to buy the UK time, and he set in motion the massive rearmament programme which the UK embarked upon from 1937. Those aren’t the actions of a man entirely under the spell of Hitler or blind to the possible outcomes and realities the UK faced. Chamberlain has gone down in history as a figure of ridicule, but this is entirely unfair. Even Churchill at the time was largely supportive of the course of action and Chamberlain served in his war cabinet (at Churchill’s personal request) until his death in 1940.

Whereas Trump is an arrogant, naive, venal, arrogant, self-serving, thick as pig shit, weird, ignorant, moronic, jumped up, racist POS.
I don't disagree that Chamberlain had principles and standards, unlike the orange pig, but the surrender of Sudetenland only empowered Hitler's expansionist policy and in hindsight only bought the time the British needed to rearm sufficiently to avoid what would probably have been a catastrophic defeat if WW2 had started in 1938. For Chamberlain, the Munich agreement was a triumph of hope and pragmatism at the time, but this proved not be enough. The Munich agreement was immensely popular (and divisive) at the time. Hindsight is wonderful thing.

Trump, on the other hand, is a property developer who thinks like one. His only strategy is to do deals that benefit his own position (he wins, everyone else loses), and he always thinks in terms of the money. His only tactic is to try and charm/smarm the strong and bully the weak. So far it is working because there is no other country both willing and able to stand up to American power and imperialism. Trump admires power, so dictatorships such as Russia and China are natural bedfellows, provided that America is always first and biggest. Liberal democracies appear weak because they pander to the vacillating will and wants of the electorate. His performance this evening was cringeworthy and embarrassing to others, but completely in character.

I can't see Trump saying anything like this if his policies fail....

Everything that I have worked for, everything that I have hoped for, everything that I have believed in during my public life has crashed into ruins. There is only one thing left for me to do: that is devote what strength and power I have to forwarding the victory of the cause for which we have sacrificed so much - Chamberlain speech, 3 September 1939
 
Last edited:




cheshunt seagull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
2,639
War hasn't happened in England for 80 years. Regardless, I'm honest about it, I love this country but I wouldn't fight for it if I had the opportunity to get out. I'm sure the majority on here if they were asked exactly the same question and were being completely honest, would say the same thing.
No, I would have fought to defend it when I was fit and able and would do whatever I can now that I am old and unwell. I hate violence but could never live with the idea of others making sacrifices for me.
 


dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,679
London
Oh do grow a brain. This man is a leader, a real leader that has taken on a **** and now he has another **** to deal with.
Cool. Well he's just signed the death warrant for another few hundred thousand because he couldn't swallow his pride. And as it stands Ukraine is f***ed.

Great leadership.
 






Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
Cool. Well he's just signed the death warrant for another few hundred thousand because he couldn't swallow his pride. And as it stands Ukraine is f***ed.

Great leadership.
Trump or Vance?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here