BiffyBoy100
Active member
- Apr 20, 2020
- 196
You’re praising FIFA, the ICC, and World Rugby as if they’re noble organisations growing the game. In reality, they’re just bureaucratic cash machines riddled with corruption, favoritism, and backroom deals.I began by stating that the viewership worldwide including America is already larger than rugby. I also don't doubt the commercial power of the NFL. However, as I said, its all about the NFL. There will never be a worldwide federal body that is not under the major control of the NFL members. There is and will not be any credible effort to produce international competition and, without that, it will always be a minority sport in World terms.
Yes the financial power of the two sports are incomparable, but in terms of worldwide competition and credibility as a competitive sport, there is, and will never be, any comparison. The organisational model of the NFL has a near total monopoly on the sport and would gain nothing from leagues of similar standard forming in other parts of the world. Its a franchise set up. It will remain a franchise set up as it is far more interested in money than it is in anything else. To say that it is growing faster in the UK market may be true, but is a bit misleading. A quick Google suggests that there are 28,600 US Football players in the UK, compared with 223,000 rugby players. It certainly has more room to grow.
The reaility? American football may have already overtaken rugby in global viewership and commercial domination outside of its traditional base, but the interest is as customers and viewers, not particpants. There is no World body like Fifa, the ICC, or World Rugby that has an interest in spreading the popularity of the game. The NFL, as the only game in town, will do nothing beyond what may line the pockets of its members. To get back on topic, there is no surprise that an organisation with those motives should be cuddling up to president Grandpa Simpson, friend of the 1%.
- FIFA—Bribery, rigged World Cup bids, and officials arrested in FBI stings. They don’t “grow the game”—they sell it to the highest bidder (Qatar?).
- ICC (Cricket)—Designed to favour India, England, and Australia, starving smaller nations of funding. The 2019 World Cup qualification was manipulated to keep “less profitable” teams out.
- World Rugby—Favors legacy teams, manipulated the 2023 World Cup seedings to protect traditional powerhouses, and does little to help emerging nations grow.
- UK Rugby vs. American Football Participation
- Yes, rugby has more players in the UK now (223,000 vs. 28,600), but American football participation has quadrupled in a decade, while rugby participation in England has declined since 2016.
- The NFL has 13 million UK fans, with 4 million "avid" fans, and London games sell out instantly. That’s a sign of a sport growing rapidly.
- Meanwhile, rugby participation in England is dropping, with clubs struggling financially.
- International Expansion
- Germany: 3M+ fans, sold-out NFL games, growing ELF league.
- Mexico: 2.5M active American football players, 20.5M watched Super Bowl LVII.
- Japan: Long-running X-League, growing grassroots programs.
- Viewership Dominance
- NFL outdraws rugby outside of World Cup years and gets more international Super Bowl viewers than any rugby event except the World Cup final.
- The European League of Football (ELF) is growing faster than any international rugby league.
Rugby may have more UK players today, but trends matter more than snapshots—and the trend is American football rising while rugby stagnates.