chip
Well-known member
It's all a bit silly, we are ALL just people.
Sadly, most people are enermous cocks
Sadly, most people are enermous cocks
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Trump's new gender executive order...
- Thread starter fork me
- Start date
Brian Munich
teH lulZ
- Jul 7, 2008
- 439
Or what? Going to tell your mum?
5Ways Gull
È quello che è
Oh if only though
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,804
Does his latest dog whistle actually change anything though? A sex has always been recorded in the birth certificate hasn't it.
People have just realised that this doesn't exactly cover how people feel.
We haven't quite managed to sort all the details out of a change in mindset, apparently we need to reset all that progression in the name of beings ****s.
People have just realised that this doesn't exactly cover how people feel.
We haven't quite managed to sort all the details out of a change in mindset, apparently we need to reset all that progression in the name of beings ****s.
Well you either have one or you don't huh?
GingerBeerMan
3-0
- Dec 29, 2011
- 8,224
Wait, you're a Trumper? I always had you down as one of the good guys. Admittedly I don't browse NSC so much anymore but I'm sure 10 years ago you were quite normal in your views?
I don't agree that the whole debate is 'f***ing idiotic' (although I can see why a man would think that). I think it is a lot more nuanced than that with valid points on both sides.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Not necessarily.
Look up George William Ziade birth certificate.
A genital malfunction - born with an enlarged clitorus.
schmunk
Well-used member
There's even a (derogatory) German word for a man who sits to piss: Sitzpinkler
dejavuatbtn
Well-known member
In which case, sitting down might prove difficult.
Sorry, I meant the ranting by the transphobic is idiotic. The debate is nuanced but I think we have elaborated a workable solution already on this thread.
But nothing will satisfy the raving transphobes, however, and that's what I had in mind in terms of f***ing idiotic. They don't want an end to the 'debate' which is also f***ing idiotic. They want it to remain a stick with which to beat 'woke'.
Edit, looking back at my post, it was clear to what I was referring. It was not the wider issue.
I wrote "about sex and gender and hairy-bollocked brickies in a dress in the Ladies' Toilet, flashing at Our Children"
The 'outrage' manifested, so I recall, when a convicted scottish sex offender rebranded himself as a woman in order to facilitate pervery.
That has nothing to do with 'the debate' and yet it was made the exception that proves the rule for the anti-woke gammons.
Curious Orange
Punxsatawney Phil
It is the outliers - the predators and perverts - that are the reason why we have female only spaces.
I've joked before that we should just signpost the gents with a picture of a cock and balls, and the ladies with the same but in a circle and crossed through. But it really is that simple in the end, and reasonable males who aren't sexual predators happily accept that they can't go in those spaces so there can be no ambiguity about any male that is there.
I realise that this means that occasionally a fully transitioned person may get challenged about being in a female only space if they don't quite pass, but they should be well aware that that is something that may happen, and the reason why.
Last edited:
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,804
My work colleagues almost to a woman unanimously agreed that they wished the defenders of their safe spaces would fight so vigorously and passionately for the spaces where statistically they were more unsafe.
Changing rooms, trans people and toilets were not high on their list of places and people that need to be made safer.
Most agreed that spending more time online discussing ways teach our boys to respect women and hold our mates accountable for toxic attitudes towards women would be infinitely more valuable than banging on about trans people in women's changing rooms/toilets.
I would be interested in the thoughts of the women of NSC on this subject.
Changing rooms, trans people and toilets were not high on their list of places and people that need to be made safer.
Most agreed that spending more time online discussing ways teach our boys to respect women and hold our mates accountable for toxic attitudes towards women would be infinitely more valuable than banging on about trans people in women's changing rooms/toilets.
I would be interested in the thoughts of the women of NSC on this subject.
I suspect I agree with you.
I hadn't mentioned the fully-transitioned male to female TG person previously in my pontifications.
My view is one can hardly weave an anti-male-pervert narrative about someone with tits and a fanny.
Even if they were born with a cock and balls.
Innit.
The Fits
Well-known member
- Jun 29, 2020
- 10,251
That’s interesting.
Guess that’s these people’s game.
Worried about your safety late at night? Fearful of sexual assault, violence, being mugged?
Sick of being sexually harassed at work?
Don’t worry, we got you. We are banning gender neutral toilets.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,804
If you are straight up about protecting women, it does seem a weird place to start/focus.
Curious Orange
Punxsatawney Phil
Banning gender neutral toilets is not in the Executive Order under discussion.
And, for clarity, the word toilet does not appear anywhere in the document. It does talk about single sex spaces, but makes no mention at all of communal ones.
Last edited:
schmunk
Well-used member
Like a lot of women they're probably keeping their heads down whilst a load of men pontificate and 'mansplain' and say how they wouldn't be intimidated by a hairy-arsed brickie in a skirt. (I'm sure they wouldn't).