schmunk
Well-used member
Surely they can't register him before Saturday...?As far as career decisions go, best for him to have a look at the journey of a certain Alex Pritchard.
Surely they can't register him before Saturday...?As far as career decisions go, best for him to have a look at the journey of a certain Alex Pritchard.
How many over 21s do they have out on loan though, are they getting near to their quota (Stirling, Kepa off the top of my head)?
He has the choice to take a wage cut if that’s what’s needed to get a game somewhereIt’s the worst possible situation football wise for the lad. Wages etc will f*** him up now on the field. He’ll be rich but unfulfilled I reckon.
YesI completely forgot Sterling went on loan to Arsenal, is he injured? He's played only 146 minutes in the league
As bad as decision for his playing time financially he’s laughing on £100k a week for 8 years if he decides to just sit back and take the money.Yup. Gomez seems a similar player but perhaps bigger and stronger.
As far as career decisions go, best for him to have a look at the journey of a certain Alex Pritchard.
On TS this week, sure i hear Alex Crook say Chelsea are paying 90% of his wages..!
It's a really odd one (one of MANY, especially at Chelsea, I might add) because there's nothing to stop him just carrying on doing what he's doing and taking the money, but Chelsea want rid of him too. So I guess it's a case of who blinks first – assuming no-one matches the deal he's got now. Chelsea would be better off giving him a pay-off, to stave off a situation where he refuses to move (which he's perfectly entitled to do) and just takes the money.It’s the worst possible situation football wise for the lad. Wages etc will f*** him up now on the field. He’ll be rich but unfulfilled I reckon.
54 years !He would leave to try to further his career. But if no one comes in for him then yes, he has the safety net of staying at Chelsea for a while. Not sure how long his contract is.
That's called "doing a Winston"As bad as decision for his playing time financially he’s laughing on £100k a week for 8 years if he decides to just sit back and take the money.
Not a tough one is it....... move to a 3 or 4 year contract on half the wage?As bad as decision for his playing time financially he’s laughing on £100k a week for 8 years if he decides to just sit back and take the money.
Trouble is, we're talking about professional sportspeople who have given their life to being the best they cab be. Not to mention the massive ego that typically comes with that.Not a tough one is it....... move to a 3 or 4 year contract on half the wage?
Or stay put and earn a cool £40m for sitting on your arse and keeping a bench warm for 8 years.
Isn't any bench I wouldn't gladly sit on, a few hours a week for 40m!
assume loan back to Leicester
Yeh, yeh, all that - but take a pay cut FFS? Geez no, unthinkable for a PL footballer (or for wealthy people in general really).Trouble is, we're talking about professional sportspeople who have given their life to being the best they cab be. Not to mention the massive ego that typically comes with that.
Being on the bench won't cut it for a lot of players - it's not like a 'normal' job where you'd be perfectly happy doing next to naff all.
Exactly – that's what I was saying before (hopefully without contradicting myself). It's a case of who caves in first or how much Chelsea would pay to get rid of him. If they give him, say, a payoff of the equivalent of three years wages – and he walks into another team and picks up a weekly fee that was vaguely close to what he was on before, then the player would consider that a win. Even if the weekly salary might be less than before.Yeh, yeh, all that - but take a pay cut FFS? Geez no, unthinkable for a PL footballer (or for wealthy people in general really).
Why not? Professionally we have an excellent relationship with themChelsea will not sell or loan him to us, that is nailed on.