Ooh I'm a very sad person. Oh and it's not derogatory, it's just showing up hypocrisy.Always think its comes over a bit sad when someone searches back another post history to find something derogatory!
Ooh I'm a very sad person. Oh and it's not derogatory, it's just showing up hypocrisy.Always think its comes over a bit sad when someone searches back another post history to find something derogatory!
It being a crap shot doesn't make it a bad chance.crap shots from outside the box like Veltman’s and March
Does it not highlight the person as being reactionary, and therefore bring their judgement into question?Always think its comes over a bit sad when someone searches back another post history to find something derogatory!
Which is the low-point of my ambitions So, you were wrong....Yes they are because they were given to someone I know by Paul Barber, something I cross checked with someone else on here who knows someone who got the same targets. While not putting a season by season on it we’re eyeing up a lot more Europe and even the Champions League, and not in a “five seasons time” way.
Enciso missed two clear cut chances, the shot against the post and the free header, both of which should have been goals.24 shots, how many troubled the keeper? Enciso had more shots in the first 39 minutes than any player has had in an entire PL game this season, and only 1 of them was half decent. Lots of weak headers from tight angles and crap shots from outside the box like Veltman’s and March’s. Don’t let stats fool you into thinking that was in any way a decent performance.
Are we not injury hit?Go to love the dreamers we created one decent chance tonight against an injury hit Brentford side.
Interesting dis
Yep, still seems a bit sad that anyone is that bothered!Does it not highlight the person as being reactionary, and therefore bring their judgement into question?
Most of the good fans here have a mental list about who the histrionic posters are, and either block them, laugh at them or try and rationalise with them.
It seems to me that the users who have come back again and again under different usernames are constantly running away from their previous embarrassments. Looking back at a poster’s history can sum up if they either believe what they are saying, or they are a troll, histrionic drama queen, or perhaps have issues relating to mental health.
Enciso had two in the first half alone.Go to love the dreamers we created one decent chance tonight against an injury hit Brentford side.
Interesting dis
When you have an XG of 1.29 from 24 shots you know they weren’t good chances. If you were entertained by tonight’s match then good for you, personally I found it another directionless and unbalanced effort against a team who are absolutely horrific away from home.It being a crap shot doesn't make it a bad chance.
Enciso hit the post, we had some good heading opportunities in the first half.
Ayari should have scored from about 12 yards in the second half as well as Veltman and March doing better with their opportunities.
Yep, still seems a bit sad that anyone is that bothered!
Most of us talk shite on here at sometime!
I think it’s preferable not to talk reactionary shite though, isn’t it?Yep, still seems a bit sad that anyone is that bothered!
Most of us talk shite on here at sometime!
Yes and no.Are we not injury hit?
I am more interested in the idea that there were boos to be heard at the final whistle than the frankly ridiculous notion that Fab should be sacked. Didn't hear any in the WSU where I was.