[Politics] Are Labour going to turn this country around?

Wallace said:

How very democratic of you.

Click to expand...

Moshe Gariani said:

Keir Starmer and his team are delivering EXACTLY what I expected and hoped for from them.

Click to expand...

Harry Wilson's tackle said:

I have very little to say about what Labour have done so far other than it seems OK

Click to expand...

The Clamp said:

The first referendum was not democratic

Click to expand...

Harry Wilson's tackle said:

I am definitely in the same camp as you. I see a dull workmanlike left of centre government taking the tough decisions quickly, without much if any thought about their own PR and spin (relabled by their opponents as making decisions with bad 'optics').

Click to expand...

Rdodge30 said:

How so ?

Click to expand...

Rdodge30 said:

The taxation on business is a huge mistake and will bring disastrous consequences for the economy and ironically for the working people Labour claim to be protecting.

I can only see it as either old fashioned left wing spite or better intentioned targeting of the wealthy businesses with out a care for the massive collateral damage inflicted on small businesses.

Either way it’s piss poor politics.

Click to expand...

The Clamp said:

Far too slim a margin for such a seismic decision. Totally undemocratic.

However, on the subject of the EU, it should never have gone to the public vote. That was a huge mistake. One which we should not repeat.

There should be no referendum on our return to the EU. It just needs to happen.

Thankfully, Starmer is doing this by stealth.

No point consulting the same thickos that voted Leave. He understands this.

Click to expand...

The Clamp said:

Far too slim a margin for such a seismic decision. Totally undemocratic.

However, on the subject of the EU, it should never have gone to the public vote. That was a huge mistake. One which we should not repeat.

There should be no referendum on our return to the EU. It just needs to happen.

Thankfully, Starmer is doing this by stealth.

No point consulting the same thickos that voted Leave. He understands this.

Click to expand...

The Clamp said:

Far too slim a margin for such a seismic decision. Totally undemocratic.

However, on the subject of the EU, it should never have gone to the public vote. That was a huge mistake. One which we should not repeat.

There should be no referendum on our return to the EU. It just needs to happen.

Thankfully, Starmer is doing this by stealth.

No point consulting the same thickos that voted Leave. He understands this.

Click to expand...

Tubby Mondays said:

Exactly what people said would happen with the introduction of the minimum wage.

did it happen?

Click to expand...

Rdodge30 said:

The taxation on business is a huge mistake and will bring disastrous consequences for the economy and ironically for the working people Labour claim to be protecting.

I can only see it as either old fashioned left wing spite or better intentioned targeting of the wealthy businesses with out a care for the massive collateral damage inflicted on small businesses.

Either way it’s piss poor politics.

Click to expand...

The Clamp said:

Far too slim a margin for such a seismic decision. Totally undemocratic.

However, on the subject of the EU, it should never have gone to the public vote. That was a huge mistake. One which we should not repeat.

There should be no referendum on our return to the EU. It just needs to happen.

Thankfully, Starmer is doing this by stealth.

No point consulting the same thickos that voted Leave. He understands this.

Click to expand...

Rdodge30 said:

Surely every poll shows that currently to rejoin would win a referendum by a landslide? Thereby creating an absolute mandate

If leaving based on a marginal referendum result was undemocratic then returning without a referendum would be even more so.

Click to expand...

nevergoagain said:

Blimey, that's a hell of a take and a lovely big brush to tar a huge number of people with. Have a day off, it's Xmas eve.

Click to expand...

sussex_guy2k2 said:

Out of interest, outside of spite, have you considered why this may be a good policy?

Click to expand...

The Clamp said:

I’ll decide when and what I post. Thank you so much.

Click to expand...

Bozza said:

I note you don't provide citation for, nor links to, any of these claims.

I doubt anyone on here has spent as much time reading and researching this subject as me, and I've not seen the supposed Age UK report, nor their subsequent distancing themselves from it.

From all of my reading, I suspect the report referenced is the 2012 Centre for Analysis of Special Exclusion (CASE) report for the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC), which covers fuel poverty and excess winter deaths extensively.

I've read the report in its entirety- it's 234 pages long - so makes for great bedtime reading. Have this link as a little early Christmas present:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a796f55e5274a2acd18ccde/4662-getting-measure-fuel-pov-final-hills-rpt.pdf

But, let's go with your version of events, this was another example of opportunistic opposition from Labour, the report was from Age UK and they've since rowed back from the findings.

It would surely be more useful to look to see if Age UK said anything in direct response to the policy as enacted by Labour. Do you agree that would be more appropriate? Allow me...

"There's been a lot of discussion about the Government's decision, but at heart Age UK's critique of their policy is really simple: we just don't think it's fair to remove the payment from the 2.5 million pensioners on low incomes who badly need it, and to do it so quickly this winter, at the same time as energy bills are rising by 10%.​

​

"It is crystal clear that there is insufficient time to make any serious impact on the miserably low take-up of Pension Credit before the cold sets in this autumn, and the Government has brought forward no effective measures to support all those whose tiny occupational pensions take them just above the line to claim. It's true they have agreed to extend the Household Support Fund until April and they deserve some credit for that, but the HSF is an all-age fund that you have to apply for, so we know it will only help a small proportion of all the pensioners who will be in need as a result of their policy change.​

​

"The Government has also tried to suggest that the increase in State Pension for older people next year as a result of the Triple Lock means there's no need to worry about how they will cope now, but that won't help anyone this winter and most pensioners will not benefit to the extent being suggested - either because they are on the old State Pension which attracts less of an increase, or because they don't qualify for a full State Pension in the first place.​

​

"The reality is that driving through this policy as the Government is doing will make millions of poor pensioners poorer still and we are baffled as to why some Ministers are asserting that this is the right thing to do. We and many others are certain that it is not, and that's why we will continue to stand with the pensioners who can't afford to lose their payment and campaign for them to be given more Government support.​

​

"Meanwhile, winter is coming and we fear it will be a deeply challenging one for millions of older people who have previously relied on their Winter Fuel Payment to help pay their energy bills and who have no obvious alternative source of funds on which to draw. As a charity we will do everything we can to help them, but with so many in need and no extra support on offer from the Government at the moment it's looking like an incredibly uphill task."​

Source: https://www.ageuk.org.uk/latest-pre...-payment-vote-defeat-in-the-house-of-commons/​

But your suggestion to discount historic statements on this, and focus on specific responses to Labour's actual policy, has me wondering if any other organisations in this field feel similarly to Age UK. And you'll never guess what? Many do...

Marie Curie

"For people who claim benefits under the Special Rules for Terminal Illness, this may very well be their last winter and Christmas. We know that energy costs can increase dramatically after a terminal diagnosis, yet the decision to restrict the Winter Fuel Payment only to people receiving means-tested benefits takes no account of this.​

​

"The festive season is meant to be one of warmth, joy, and celebration. No one should have to face their final days worrying about money or whether they can afford to heat their home or even switch on Christmas lights. The government should urgently rethink this decision, and take further steps to support people at the end of life with energy costs, including by introducing a social tariff."​

​

Source: https://www.mariecurie.org.uk/media...el-payment-under-uk-government-changes/385291​

Independent Age

“Tying the Winter Fuel Payment to Pension Credit now will see far too many older people fall through the cracks. Pension Credit still has a stubbornly low take up and in addition there is a large group of older people living just above the entitlement’s threshold, sometimes by just a few pounds. People in this situation will now have this vital money taken away from them. That’s why we are heading to Downing Street to urge the UK Government to protect the payment for those in later life living on low incomes.​

​

“With winter around the corner, now is the time to bring older people on a low income back in from the cold.”​

​

Source: https://www.independentage.org/news...-new-research-shows-impact-of-change-on-older​

End Fuel Poverty Coallition

“The long term way to reduce the costs to the NHS of people living in cold damp homes is to improve insulation and ventilation of buildings as well as stabilise energy costs by getting the country away from being hooked on volatile gas prices.​

​

“But until the Government fully implements its positive plans in these areas, vulnerable households will continue to need financial support. That’s why the Winter Fuel Payments were so important, the money provided help for older households to stay warm each winter.​

​

“Sadly, now more older people are expected to live in cold damp homes this winter and this puts them at greater risk of ill health, meaning the costs to the NHS will soar.”​

National Pensioners Convention

“The loss of the winter fuel allowance for the majority of older people clearly puts them at risk. It is a known fact that older people require warmth and a stable temperature to maintain their health.​

​

“Living in cold, damp homes heightens the risk of strokes, heart disease, respiratory conditions and generally harms the rest of the body.​

​

It therefore follows that the risk of overwhelming the NHS in winter is high and the cost of dealing with the consequences of the Government decision will be felt throughout the NHS and care sectors.”​

​

Independent Age (again)

“Many of the older people on a low income we speak to tell us they were already cutting back on heating before the announcement to means test the winter fuel payment.​

​

“With the reality of now losing hundreds of pounds this winter, many have shared they will be making severe cutbacks including not turning the heating on at all.​

​

“Others have told us they will reduce the amount they eat so they can turn the heating on for a few hours a day.​

​

“It is unacceptable that people in later life are having to make dangerous sacrifices as we approach the colder months, and we are concerned that the demand for NHS services could increase as a result.”​

​

You and I know that I could go on and on and on here. There's a strong and consistent theme from organisations who work in the field of elderly care and poverty. You don't have to read much to find terms such as "cruel", "dangerous" and "brutal".

We've known each other for a long time - close to 30 years now - and I know you're a decent and compassionate sort. I admire the amazing work you have done with charity to help very vulnerable people.

So, given I think I know you reasonably well, are you going to surprise me and say you fully support this policy in its entirety? I'm not interested in the wealthiest c90% of pensionsers losing this benefit. The universality was wrong, and the money can be better spent.

But amongst the poorest 10% losing the benefit, which still numbers c1m people, there are people with meagre incomes, no savings and the WFA provided some respite to allow the heating to be turned on occasionally on the very coldest days. Do you support the removal of the payment from these people?

Click to expand...

The Clamp said:

The first referendum was not democratic.

Click to expand...