Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Brighton] Our city
- Thread starter Gava
- Start date
- Status
- Thread starter
- #202
Yeah true but it not just that. Its everythingLike I say, google maps is perfectly happy with the existing naming structure. Who even uses google earth for anything, other than maybe an oddball with a bee in their bonnet hunting around for something - anything! - that supports their crackpot idea
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
I believe in Joe Hendry
- Oct 4, 2003
- 12,211
Like I say, google maps is perfectly happy with the existing naming structure. Who even uses google earth for anything, other than maybe an oddball with a bee in their bonnet hunting around for something - anything! - that supports their crackpot idea
Google Earth does know about Brighton and Hove. Both Maps and Earth will pull most of its data from the same place so it makes no sense for one to know about it and not the other.
Here is proof too just to put more holes in the OPs claims. His version of Google Earth must be stuck in 1993 with the Brighton vs Swansea game he went to.
- Thread starter
- #204
- Thread starter
- #206
Without searching you won’t see
- Apr 5, 2014
- 26,330
Okay. You seem to really believe in this so... as a resident of 50 something silly years...Hello Eric,
Yes, I did join to promote the petition. I have a deep patriotism for my city and club. The reason I want this is because I want the city to be up there with the best in England same as our team . Our city often gets undervalued because Brighton and Hove are frequently seen as separate entities, which undermines us globally.
If this change happens, Brighton will be the biggest city in the South, fact. and to be honest, I’d love to see a sign saying, “Welcome to the City of Brighton.” That’s power. There definitely wouldn’t be any disadvantages, and we wouldn’t lose anything.
Put it this way—if a new hotel or residential development is available in Brighton, it’s naturally more appealing, isn’t it? As for costs, there’s no need to rush things, like changing all the street signs immediately. Hove would still be part of Brighton, but I’d love to see the first street sign with “The City of Brighton” on it.
I’m not a councillor; I’m just someone from Brighton. My first game was at the Goldstone Ground in 1993, a 4-1 win against Swansea. I went to Gillingham regularly, taking the bus from Hove, and now I’m a season ticket holder.
Yes, I did join to promote the petition. I have a deep patriotism for my city and club. The reason I want this is because I want the city to be up there with the best in England same as our team . Our city often gets undervalued because Brighton and Hove are frequently seen as separate entities, which undermines us globally.
If this change happens, Brighton will be the biggest city in the South, fact. and to be honest, I’d love to see a sign saying, “Welcome to the City of Brighton.” That’s power. There definitely wouldn’t be any disadvantages, and we wouldn’t lose anything.
Put it this way—if a new hotel or residential development is available in Brighton, it’s naturally more appealing, isn’t it? As for costs, there’s no need to rush things, like changing all the street signs immediately. Hove would still be part of Brighton, but I’d love to see the first street sign with “The City of Brighton” on it
I’m not a councillor; I’m just someone from Brighton. My first game was at the Goldstone Ground in 1993, a 4-1 win against Swansea. I went to Gillingham regularly, taking the bus from Hove, and now I’m a season ticket holder.
I’m not a councillor; I’m just someone from Brighton. My first game was at the Goldstone Ground in 1993, a 4-1 win against Swansea. I went to Gillingham regularly, taking the bus from Hove, and now I’m a season ticket holder.
I remember that match well. Evening game. Not 1993 though, April 1994
Yes, I did join to promote the petition. I have a deep patriotism for my city and club. The reason I want this is because I want the city to be up there with the best in England same as our team . Our city often gets undervalued because Brighton and Hove are frequently seen as separate entities, which undermines us globally.
A lot to unpack there. It's a contradictory statement you make. That Brighton & Hove is a city makes it a single entity with two distinct areas. The title merely reflecting its history. It's meant to. How does this undermine us globally ? Do you have evidence of Japanese investor saying 'I'm confused by this clearly boundary defined city ?
If this change happens, Brighton will be the biggest city in the South, fact. and to be honest, I’d love to see a sign saying, “Welcome to the City of Brighton.” That’s power. There definitely wouldn’t be any disadvantages, and we wouldn’t lose anything.
No, it won't, because Brighton & Hove is already the biggest city outside London in the South of England (depending on how you regard Milton Keynes). By changing the name you cannot change the boundaries
Put it this way—if a new hotel or residential development is available in Brighton, it’s naturally more appealing, isn’t it? As for costs, there’s no need to rush things, like changing all the street signs immediately. Hove would still be part of Brighton, but I’d love to see the first street sign with “The City of Brighton” on it .
You might love it, but Hove folk won't and neither will the many of us who regard Brighton as a town anyway. I support Whitehawk, a few years ago they wanted to become 'Brighton City' they were quickly told where to go by the supporters.
'By adopting “Brighton” as our official city name, we aim to bring a stronger, more unified identity to our community'
There was me thinking the word 'and' had caused enough annoyance. Good luck convincing the folk in Hove of this
In summary, your petition is a waste of council time (if it goes to debate), is nonsensical in its logic, and I really would go back to enjoying the chant 'knees up Brighton town' or 'And Brighton, Hove Albion...' because that is where nearly everyone is at. It won't be changing.
Anyway, 53 people have signed. I suspect mostly divorcees whose ex-wives or husbands have shacked up in New Church Road with Toby the accountant. A few thousand folk have viewed this thread alone. Maybe time to retire. Did someone say you lived in Saltdean ? I hope that's not east of Longridge Avenue, because you may find that you're not even a resident.
Last edited:
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
I believe in Joe Hendry
- Oct 4, 2003
- 12,211
You said Google Earth doesn’t know about Brighton and Hove when it clearly does.
Searching for things is generally how these apps work. We all know where the city is so what does it matter if there isn’t some text label for it? How would changing the cities name to just Brighton fix this issue?
Are we missing out on millions of tourists because this text label doesn’t exist so people simply won’t visit because they can’t possibly find Brighton and Hove in any other way.
I’ve checked Google Maps and that doesn’t show a label for Brighton either until you zoom in pretty close. I think you’ve stumbled on some conspiracy led by Google to keep the city of Brighton and Hove down. Damn you Larry Page. I bet he’s doing this cause he’s a Palace fan, or visited once and got a verruca at Prince Regent.
- Aug 24, 2020
- 7,446
Gava, you say 'I've also emailed Paul Barber to make sure the club would be okay with this idea'.
What was Paul Barber's response?
What was Paul Barber's response?
- Thread starter
- #211
He just said the club would stay the same so I guess he was ok with it. But i wasn't trying to change our club anyway.
Bro just want to let you know you have my 100% support in your quest for... something.
I’d imagine he’s still waiting for it
- Oct 17, 2008
- 15,019
Or still reading it
Forget the idea for a second - are you having trouble posting? As a tip hit the 'carriage return' key when you want to add a new sentence, not the 'Post reply' button.
- Aug 24, 2020
- 7,446
Absolutely. He also said 'If the club were against it, I wouldn’t go any further with it.'
Yet, he has already started an e-petition, and he's joined NSC, posting a thread to elicit support for it.
All without a response from PB. I think he's getting a bit over-excited.
- Thread starter
- #217
Okay. You seem to really believe in this so... as a resident of 50 something silly years...
I’m not a councillor; I’m just someone from Brighton. My first game was at the Goldstone Ground in 1993, a 4-1 win against Swansea. I went to Gillingham regularly, taking the bus from Hove, and now I’m a season ticket holder.
I remember that match well. Evening game. Not 1993 though, April 1994
Yes, I did join to promote the petition. I have a deep patriotism for my city and club. The reason I want this is because I want the city to be up there with the best in England same as our team . Our city often gets undervalued because Brighton and Hove are frequently seen as separate entities, which undermines us globally.
A lot to unpack there. It's a contradictory statement you make. That Brighton & Hove is a city makes it a single entity with two distinct areas. The title merely reflecting its history. It's meant to. How does this undermine us globally ? Do you have evidence of Japanese investor saying 'I'm confused by this clearly boundary defined city ?
If this change happens, Brighton will be the biggest city in the South, fact. and to be honest, I’d love to see a sign saying, “Welcome to the City of Brighton.” That’s power. There definitely wouldn’t be any disadvantages, and we wouldn’t lose anything.
No, it won't, because Brighton & Hove is already the biggest city outside London in the South of England (depending on how you regard Milton Keynes). By changing the name you cannot change the boundaries
Put it this way—if a new hotel or residential development is available in Brighton, it’s naturally more appealing, isn’t it? As for costs, there’s no need to rush things, like changing all the street signs immediately. Hove would still be part of Brighton, but I’d love to see the first street sign with “The City of Brighton” on it .
You might love it, but Hove folk won't and neither will the many of us who regard Brighton as a town anyway. I support Whitehawk, a few years ago they wanted to become 'Brighton City' they were quickly told where to go by the supporters.
'By adopting “Brighton” as our official city name, we aim to bring a stronger, more unified identity to our community'
There was me thinking the word 'and' had caused enough annoyance. Good luck convincing the folk in Hove of this
In summary, your petition is a waste of council time (if it goes to debate), is nonsensical in its logic, and I really would go back to enjoying the chant 'knees up Brighton town' or 'And Brighton, Hove Albion...' because that is where nearly everyone is at. It won't be changing.
Anyway, 53 people have signed. I suspect mostly divorcees whose ex-wives or husbands have shacked up in New Church Road with Toby the accountant. A few thousand folk have viewed this thread alone. Maybe time to retire. Did someone say you lived in Saltdean ? I hope that's not east of Longridge Avenue, because you may find that you're not even
What I mean is we get overlooked. The city often doesn't get seen as Brighton and Hove, which then doesn't show our true size, pop ect and de-values us. Boundaries wont change. Like I said Hove will still be there but it'll officially come under Brighton. Hove status wont change its just uniting under a single city name.Okay. You seem to really believe in this so... as a resident of 50 something silly years...
I’m not a councillor; I’m just someone from Brighton. My first game was at the Goldstone Ground in 1993, a 4-1 win against Swansea. I went to Gillingham regularly, taking the bus from Hove, and now I’m a season ticket holder.
I remember that match well. Evening game. Not 1993 though, April 1994
Yes, I did join to promote the petition. I have a deep patriotism for my city and club. The reason I want this is because I want the city to be up there with the best in England same as our team . Our city often gets undervalued because Brighton and Hove are frequently seen as separate entities, which undermines us globally.
A lot to unpack there. It's a contradictory statement you make. That Brighton & Hove is a city makes it a single entity with two distinct areas. The title merely reflecting its history. It's meant to. How does this undermine us globally ? Do you have evidence of Japanese investor saying 'I'm confused by this clearly boundary defined city ?
If this change happens, Brighton will be the biggest city in the South, fact. and to be honest, I’d love to see a sign saying, “Welcome to the City of Brighton.” That’s power. There definitely wouldn’t be any disadvantages, and we wouldn’t lose anything.
No, it won't, because Brighton & Hove is already the biggest city outside London in the South of England (depending on how you regard Milton Keynes). By changing the name you cannot change the boundaries
Put it this way—if a new hotel or residential development is available in Brighton, it’s naturally more appealing, isn’t it? As for costs, there’s no need to rush things, like changing all the street signs immediately. Hove would still be part of Brighton, but I’d love to see the first street sign with “The City of Brighton” on it .
You might love it, but Hove folk won't and neither will the many of us who regard Brighton as a town anyway. I support Whitehawk, a few years ago they wanted to become 'Brighton City' they were quickly told where to go by the supporters.
'By adopting “Brighton” as our official city name, we aim to bring a stronger, more unified identity to our community'
There was me thinking the word 'and' had caused enough annoyance. Good luck convincing the folk in Hove of this
In summary, your petition is a waste of council time (if it goes to debate), is nonsensical in its logic, and I really would go back to enjoying the chant 'knees up Brighton town' or 'And Brighton, Hove Albion...' because that is where nearly everyone is at. It won't be changing.
Anyway, 53 people have signed. I suspect mostly divorcees whose ex-wives or husbands have shacked up in New Church Road with Toby the accountant. A few thousand folk have viewed this thread alone. Maybe time to retire. Did someone say you lived in Saltdean ? I hope that's not east of Longridge Avenue, because you may find that you're not even a resident.
- Thread starter
- #218
Coldeanseagull
Opinionated
I was born in Hove, actually. I am a dyed in the wool Hovite.
You can f*** right off with this singular name
You can f*** right off with this singular name
- Aug 24, 2020
- 7,446
You don't think he was being diplomatic then?
Out of interest, if you weren't trying to change our club, why did you ask him? Why did you offer him a veto on your idea?
You've gone ahead anyway.
- Status