Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] VAR v Southampton







Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,416
If it's true that Webb said that then I disagree both in law and in common sense. I simply don't understand football any more - I'll also remind people that the panel adjudged Gibbs-White nasty challenge on Pedro didn't warrant a yellow card. Madness.
Gallagher's summary was along the lines of players and pundits are split down the middle, therefore the on field decision should stand.
It's what most of us signed up to and goes along with teh "high bar" edict.

As you say, if Webb has come out with this decision being a mistake.....
Very , very, poor judgement from him.
 


ROSM

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2005
6,867
Just far enough away from LDC
I can only fund Russell Martin saying Howard Webb said the goal should have stood. I haven't seen a public statement from Webb himself.

Maybe he is saving it for his michael owen tv show. No spoilers eh Howard!
 


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,416
Just seen the clip from Martin's presser.

https://www.skysports.com/football/...sallowed-goal-against-brighton-shouldve-stood

Sounds very much like he's taking a personal conversation with Webb out of context.
Webb's opinion was the on-field decision was wrong, and if the goal had been given VAR wouldn't have overturned it.

Martin is blowing that up into a much bigger, position saying that "the bottom line is it was a goal"
This is a subjective decision, completely open to interpretation.
 






CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,121
The whole VAR debate is driven by those who force ever more CONTENT down our THROATS.

This would not be a disussion if people like Dermot Gallagher weren't on Sky, from a position on responsiblity as a former ref, saying stupid things like 'by the letter of the law it's offside, but then it comes down to opinions'. No it doesn't you twonk.
 










Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,629
Goldstone
The second time Webb has bowed to online/media comments against us., on very subjective decisions.

Claimed Kavanagh failing to book Pedro for kicking the ball away at Arsenal was a definite yellow. It wasn't.
Now claiming that a perfectly reasonable, subjective offside decision was wrong. It wasn't.

Cue every Prem manager getting on his case about consistency.
If he wants to open that can of worms, how about Downes getting away with multiple 2nd yellow cards, in comparison to Baleba's.

Bloke's a cock.

Barber should write to him
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,629
Goldstone
If he touched the ball does that make a difference to offside? I thought the offside situation only changed if a defender made a controlled play. So a minor deflection is irrelevant.
I think it's deliberate rather than controlled from the defender. But not when the offside player is making the defender make an attempt.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,629
Goldstone
Just seen the clip from Martin's presser.

https://www.skysports.com/football/...sallowed-goal-against-brighton-shouldve-stood

Sounds very much like he's taking a personal conversation with Webb out of context.
Webb's opinion was the on-field decision was wrong, and if the goal had been given VAR wouldn't have overturned it.

Martin is blowing that up into a much bigger, position saying that "the bottom line is it was a goal"
This is a subjective decision, completely open to interpretation.
I don't agree that's it's subjective. He was definitely interfering with play, therefore offside.
 








mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
22,024
England
I don't agree that's it's subjective. He was definitely interfering with play, therefore offside.
I might be misunderstanding your point, but the element of "is a player interfering with play" is the subjective element here.

It doesn't matter how obvious you think it is, there was a subjective element as a decision had to be made.

There was a subjective element to this decision as the player in question did not receive the ball.

If he received the ball then it's not subjective.

The subjective element is that the referee etc have to decide, in their opinion, whether his presence met the necessary criteria to be deemed offside. Ie did he make an attempt to touch the ball or did he impact play/an opponent with his presence in an offside position.

They decided he did.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,629
Goldstone
I might be misunderstanding your point, but the element of "is a player interfering with play" is the subjective element here.

It doesn't matter how obvious you think it is, there was a subjective element as a decision had to be made.

There was a subjective element to this decision as the player in question did not receive the ball.

If he received the ball then it's not subjective.

The subjective element is that the referee etc have to decide, in their opinion, whether his presence met the necessary criteria to be deemed offside. Ie did he make an attempt to touch the ball or did he impact play/an opponent with his presence in an offside position.

They decided he did.

Understood.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here