I thought this was going to be a thread about Kylie 
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] What an arse
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
Whilst I prefer to stay humble and respectful I couldn’t help but glut when the decision went our way.
Van Cleef
Well-known member
- Jun 17, 2023
- 863
I'm inclined to agree. Mitomas incline could easily have put his armpit offside on another day. Stick to feet I say.
A mex eyecan
Well-known member
- Nov 3, 2011
- 3,971
yes, they were trying to see if there was a crack in their defence
- Nov 11, 2009
- 12,378
You've got a cheek
US Seagull
Well-known member
From the real-time footage on the TV, Mitoma was out of frame. So when JP first played that pass, my first thought was "who the f**k was that to?". Followed by "whoa, who's that? Where the f**k did he come from?". Then "is that Mitoma?" And then " holy crap! We scored!"
It literally seemed like he'd come out of nowhere.
It literally seemed like he'd come out of nowhere.
I sphinc you’re right.
The second half had only just started as well, early back doors.
Good thing Mitoma doesn't have hair like Cucurella.
Yes, I watched the replay on TV many times, but couldn’t work out the path of the ball through the defenders. It looked diagonal, but that pic makes sense of it.
- Feb 22, 2014
- 2,866
What a ridiculous situation we have got ourselves into. Minutely examining whether someones pubes are offside when the player is not even in the Penalty box. The time wasted to examine something that could in no way be decrilbed as goal haninging. The VAR system is bollox but it makes money so we are stuck with it. It’s still bollox because it has not stopped discussion it has generated more. No problem with that but it holds up the game unnecessarily.
Wouldn't want Igor as the last defender in that scenario.
smillie's garden
Am I evil?
- Aug 11, 2003
- 2,760
VAR made a booty call.
tronnogull
Well-known member
- May 17, 2010
- 617
Yes, if they changed the offside law so it was only the position of player's feet which determined offside, then it would be much more straightforward to judge and also much more in keeping with the intent of the offside law.......
……until someone scores with a brilliant diving header that would have been off
Braggfan
In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded
- May 12, 2014
- 1,998
What I don't understand about offside is, if Mitoma's shoulder is what they were looking at there. And if his should is offside by an inch or so, then they disallow the goal. But by that logic how did that Roma goal get given last year? Was that just an appalling decision? Because its so clear that the Roma player's arm, should and head were all past the player.
