Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)



E

Ethelwulf

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2020
2,263
West Worthing
Russia is on the verge of collapse and civil war . Putin would never use a nuclear bomb because he would be taken out by his own side before he could . The biggest worry for me is if Russia does collapse and several new nations emerge that have nuclear weapons that they might use against each other . The hatred built up over centuries will spill over .
Putins last hope of staying in power is Trump . If trump holds his nerve and goes big on Ukraine Russia will collapse
And to all those worried about nuclear war etc do you really think that Russia would allow Putin to use a nuclear bomb and the fact that behind the scenes the Americans were informed by Russia before they launched the missile yesterday to avoid any misunderstanding
And China who is keeping the Russians off life support has already said that any sort of nuclear strike from Russia would bring a response from them as well
China will invade Russia in the next 10 years to reclaim all the land the tsars took of them in the 19th century
The west has got to not blink and stand firm
 






Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,089
Goldstone
Easy 10 said:
No.
But I'm not talking about whether it would be 'justified' or not. We're dealing with an unpredictable crackpot dictator who at the moment is seeing British missiles pummelling his country. In his head, that might justify putting us in the crosshairs. An attack on a NATO nation would be a massive escalation obviously, so it could all be bluster as usual. We hope.
Click to expand...

Yeah but you did say 'What should our response be, given that its basically what we are doing to Russia'. I disagree with that part.

I assume it's bluster but if we're attacked we'll respond.
 


Commander

Commander

Arrogant Prat
NSC Patron
Apr 28, 2004
13,558
London
Triggaaar said:
Yeah but you did say 'What should our response be, given that its basically what we are doing to Russia'. I disagree with that part.

I assume it's bluster but if we're attacked we'll respond.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter if you disagree with it though, it's how Putin sees it. And I'm assuming he sees it like that.
 


Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,089
Goldstone
Commander said:
It doesn't matter if you disagree with it though, it's how Putin sees it. And I'm assuming he sees it like that.
Click to expand...
I'm don't think he does see it as Britain firing missiles at Russia. If he does, then presumably he'll fire missiles at us. Has he done that yet?

And we should help Ukraine defend themselves based on international law, not based on how an evil dictator claims to see things.
 






D

driddles

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2003
655
Ontario, Canada






Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,400
Location Location
Triggaaar said:
I'm don't think he does see it as Britain firing missiles at Russia. If he does, then presumably he'll fire missiles at us. Has he done that yet?

And we should help Ukraine defend themselves based on international law, not based on how an evil dictator claims to see things.
Click to expand...
Not yet, but this is a very recent escalation.

I agree, along with the other NATO nations we should absolutely continue to help Ukraine defend itself. But its going beyond that now - we are actively helping Ukraine to go on the attack and retaliate. There is a difference.

I'm not saying I think Putin would actually go nuclear, that would be mental. But he does have other levers to pull, including ICBM's. I don't think its exaggerrating to say we are potentially moving towards another Cuban missile crisis here.
 


GoldstoneVintage

GoldstoneVintage

Active member
Oct 20, 2024
59
Europe
Easy 10 said:
Not yet, but this is a very recent escalation.

I agree, along with the other NATO nations we should absolutely continue to help Ukraine defend itself. But its going beyond that now - we are actively helping Ukraine to go on the attack and retaliate. There is a difference.

I'm not saying I think Putin would actually go nuclear, that would be mental. But he does have other levers to pull, including ICBM's. I don't think its exaggerrating to say we are potentially moving towards another Cuban missile crisis here.
Click to expand...
I don't agree that we are going beyond helping Ukraine defend itself. The targets they are striking in Russia are contributing to Ukrainian defense by weakening the Russian's ability to attack them. They are not trying to conquer Russia. They are still defending their own country.
 


fly high

fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
1,720
in a house
With all this talk on here & on the news of Putin's threats to bomb London my subconscious obviously went into overdrive last night. I very, very rarely remember dreams but this one has stuck.

I was driving across Ashdown Forest (live near it & driven across it many times), sun was out & windows were down, drove round a corner & hit a wall of black smoke. Radio wouldn't work so I drove on & eventually came back out into the sun. Looking north there where plumes of smoke rising then suddenly a large ball of smoke, just a ball. I found myself at a café!!! I asked a waitress if London was being bombed & she said it was. Then I woke up.....

Absolutely no way does my conscious mind think Putin will bomb London & if he were that stupid thousands of missiles would rain down on every military site in Russia from every NATO country.
 




Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,400
Location Location
GoldstoneVintage said:
I don't agree that we are going beyond helping Ukraine defend itself. The targets they are striking in Russia are contributing to Ukrainian defense by weakening the Russian's ability to attack them. They are not trying to conquer Russia. They are still defending their own country.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree with that reasoning. But you are assuming that Putin would see it the same way, when right now he is receiving British and American missiles inside Russian territory. Add in the fact that we don't really control exactly where Ukraine are lobbing them, and its an all-new tinderbox.

Sabre-rattling from the Kremlin is nothing new of course. But we've not been in this territory before.
 




Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,089
Goldstone
Easy 10 said:
Not yet, but this is a very recent escalation.

I agree, along with the other NATO nations we should absolutely continue to help Ukraine defend itself. But its going beyond that now - we are actively helping Ukraine to go on the attack and retaliate. There is a difference.
Click to expand...

I respectfully disagree. In my mind (which is a dark and twisted world) retaliation would be Ukraine bombing civilians, schools, hospitals etc across the whole of Russia (as well as ethnic cleansing and the like). They are striking military targets, to reduce the damage that Russia are doing to civilians inside Ukraine.

EDIT - I see you've already replied to GV who made the same point as me
 




nicko31

nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,570
Gods country fortnightly




Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,400
Location Location
Triggaaar said:
I respectfully disagree. In my mind (which is a dark and twisted world) retaliation would be Ukraine bombing civilians, schools, hospitals etc across the whole of Russia (as well as ethnic cleansing and the like). They are striking military targets, to reduce the damage that Russia are doing to civilians inside Ukraine.

EDIT - I see you've already replied to GV who made the same point as me
Click to expand...
Putin is a sociopath, who has absolutely no qualms about drafting and sending in thousands of his civilians into the meat-grinder at the battlefront. I don't think he would differentiate between British / US missiles hitting military or civiilan targets inside Russia tbh - the fact is, Russian territory is now being struck by Western missiles.

I hope you're right, and he just considers it as all part of the deal when he decided on this jolly invasion. But he embarked on it due to what he saw as an increasing NATO creep onto his doorstep. Now that NATO are in effect blowing up stuff in Russia, I am not as confident as you that he won't react.
 


A1X

A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,521
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Ethelwulf said:
Russia is on the verge of collapse and civil war . Putin would never use a nuclear bomb because he would be taken out by his own side before he could . The biggest worry for me is if Russia does collapse and several new nations emerge that have nuclear weapons that they might use against each other . The hatred built up over centuries will spill over .
Click to expand...
Agreed, the prospect of a civil war in a state with a whole load of nuclear weapons swimming about with nobody likely keeping tabs on them and securing where they are fills me with more dread than anything Putin might do. And even if they don't use them on each other, there are plenty of external malevolent actors who would be more than happy to take them off their hands...
 




Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,089
Goldstone
Easy 10 said:
Putin is a sociopath, who has absolutely no qualms about drafting and sending thousands of his civilians into the meat-grinder at the battlefront. I don't think he would differentiate between British and US missiles hitting military or civiilan targets inside Russia tbh - the fact is, Russian territory is now being struck by Western missiles.
Click to expand...

We had the same discussion earlier - what Putin thinks (or may think), and what we think. Your post "we are actively helping Ukraine to go on the attack and retaliate" suggests that's what you think? I agree that we're helping them more than we previously were. And Putin won't like it. But I personally don't think we're doing anything wrong and I don't see it as retaliation, I think we're just giving Ukraine more tools to defend themselves.


Easy 10 said:
I hope you're right, and he just considers it as all part of the deal when he decided on this jolly invasion.
Click to expand...

I have no idea what he's going to do, but I feel that we can't allow him to take over Ukraine. I think the UK did the right thing in WW2, and it led to our country being bombed and us losing something approaching a million people (might be well out there). With hindsight, do we think we should have just let Hitler get on with it and saved ourselves? Not for me Clive.

We're obviously lucky to have lived through peace, and it's an understatement to say it would be bad if we're dragged into a war with missiles raining down over the UK. But (and I appreciate I'll be in a minority here) I'd rather that, than back down and allow Russia to take over Europe one country at a time. I don't think it's worth humans existing if we can't live free.

Easy 10 said:
But he embarked on it due to what he saw as an increasing NATO creep onto his doorstep.
Click to expand...

I disagree (again). Russia wants to get rid of Ukraine. He doesn't want a successful democracy on his doorstep, particularly one full of Slavs, highlighting how crap Russians have it. I don't think it mattered if NATO had guaranteed no entry for Ukraine (which NATO should never do anyway).


Easy 10 said:
Now NATO are in effect blowing up stuff in Russia, I am not as confident as you that he won't react.
Click to expand...

I guess there are different levels of reaction. But even if he reacts strongly, I still think it's the right thing for us to do (as described above).

Have Russia made the same threats to the US and France, who have also allowed their weapons to be used in the same way?
 


Eric the meek

Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,081
A1X said:
Agreed, the prospect of a civil war in a state with a whole load of nuclear weapons swimming about with nobody likely keeping tabs on them and securing where they are fills me with more dread than anything Putin might do. And even if they don't use them on each other, there are plenty of external malevolent actors who would be more than happy to take them off their hands...
Click to expand...
I'm not so sure there would be a full-on civil war. Unrest, lawlessness, gunfights on the streets of Moscow sure, but an organised uprising? I'm not so sure. These people are fragmented and diverse across a vast continent.

The reason I say this, is that, according to Paul Warburg, the ethnic republics and oblasts have historically been kept separate, as a deliberate policy, to avoid any organised opposition to Moscow. Warburg suggests that this is the reason there are few roads or rail hubs in Siberia - apart from those that were built to exploit the natural wealth of Siberia. Many communities cannot physically get together to organise opposition or resistance.

That said, the inhabitants of the ethnic republics have never known self-determination. They may sense a power vacuum in Moscow and some may go after those who have oppressed them for centuries. The Russians.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here