People do go and live in a different country the issue is how many the Government decide to let in and for what motives.
And the real reason why Canadians detest Americans & Trump.
People do go and live in a different country the issue is how many the Government decide to let in and for what motives.
We’ve had 4 years of Trump and 4 years of Biden/Harris. The last 4 years have been a shit show, infinitely worse.Why can’t you or Dingo?
The number of times you’ve been asked directly why you would prefer Trump to Harris and all we get is ….
Deflect
Deflect
Deflect
I’m not a big fan of Trump, as you know. But posters on here know as much about Harris as I know about Kier Starmer, nothing.I am a strong anti-trumper as you know but just I can't warm to Harris at all. I knew nothing about her when she became elevated to candidate, and was initially excited. But it turns out the more I see of her the more she reminds me of some of the more irritating people I deal with in my workspace.
People who don't respond in timely manner to emails. People who initiate correspondence that is 90% 'background' and 10% 'action request' with the latter written in an ambiguous manner. And follow up questions are answered by reference to previous ambiguous correspondence or hyperlinks to committee policy statements. "But what do you want me to do" I say. Then it turns out the email doesn't apply to me and I was supposed to have realized that all by myself.
Perhaps I'm being unfair. But I didn't get where I am today by being fair.
When have you ever been wrong? Apart from Tony Blair that is…There is a serious point. I would have thought that Harris would be miles ahead in the polls, but she isn't. There has to be a reason for that beyond racism and MAGA wankpuffinry. Something about her ambience, maybe?
A bit like Starmer - I'm not disappointed with him because of the suits or the hamfisted winter fuel nonsense. There is just something off. Something suety. The endless repetition about his mother (I can't remember what it is she did for a living, now, but I seem to recall being told repeatedly) was.....weird.
I'm not expecting @lasvegan to explain yet again why he's backing Trump, and can live with a disagreement about this (I would happily back Harris, even Keith or Chopper, albeit probably not Rolf, given a choice).
But illuminating the odd lack of massive lead by Harris is useful, I think.
I could of course be wrong
You can't take anything like this for granted. I still think there are many women with Trump supporting husbands who will vote for Harris and never tell another soul.
I can't remember if I was wrong for loving the early optimism or for sneering at the needless WMD debacle. Or for despairing of conviction politicians.When have you ever been wrong? Apart from Tony Blair that is…
That "praise" was all part of the "grovelling" process that Newsom states was necessary to secure Trump's help.He previously praised Trump during the forest fires and covid
Loading…
www.politico.com
There is enough to go at him for rather than finding evidence to counter what Newsome says here, helps Trump no end
Newsome however should have been the nominee and I imagine will be at the next election, I imagine he would have been miles ahead of Trump now.
Trump inherited an economy booming after 8 years of Obama's presidency.We’ve had 4 years of Trump and 4 years of Biden/Harris. The last 4 years have been a shit show, infinitely worse.
I can't believe that wasn't obvious from the start? Vance was the pick of the tech billionaires, in particular Peter Thiel. The men with the actual money who are running things for the Trump campaign. Vance is their guy and the presumptive nominee in 4 years time, so long as he keeps doing what he's currently doing and to be fair to him, he's a much more reasonable public speaker than Trump (that's a very low bar).Musk is perhaps more interested in Vance being President than Trump. Trump could just be the means to that end for Musk. The next stage might be for Trump to be removed from office on mental/health grounds by the VP.
The question I am unsure of is whether Vance is part of Putin's plan. My heart says yes, my head is uncertain for now.
That "praise" was all part of the "grovelling" process that Newsom states was necessary to secure Trump's help.
He remained dependent on Trump's help and support all the while Trump was president so he did what he knew was necessary, which was to appeal to Trump's vanity, and obviously not to his humanity, so you can take that "praise" with a pinch of salt.
In what ways exactly?The last 4 years have been a shit show, infinitely worse.
Maybe because he was playing the game of trying to get his people the help they needed, because Trump is a massive narcissist (allegedly) and needs fluffing to do even the most basic of things a leader should do?So why should we take what he's saying now as the truth a couple of weeks before the election if he's played the game in the past?
"The President of the USA was only speculating (without any basis of logic, aforthought or knowledge) live on TV about injecting disinfectant" - oh! well that's OK then!! FFS!Maybe you should watch your own link, he doesn't suggest injecting bleach he said maybe use some kind of disinfectant, its quite clear he was speculating.
-or-If its a straight numbers game its easier to rig manipulating demographics.
NoTrump won't last long as President will he ? His mental/physical health won't last the 4 years.
So that would mean President Vance. Is that a good prospect ?