[Albion] Daily Mail apology

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in


Jim in the West

Jim in the West

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 13, 2003
4,954
Way out West
Just seen this on the official site (my apologies if it's fixtures):

The club can confirm that the following clarification and correction appeared in today’s Daily Mail (4 October 2024).
‘An article in Saturday’s paper said that Brighton & Hove Albion FC owner Tony Bloom invited Sir Keir Starmer to a game against Arsenal on April 6, and suggested this was to lobby him about the forthcoming Football Governance Bill.
‘In fact, the PM’s invitation came from a third party as part of a standard Premier League arrangement with visiting teams and Brighton have confirmed, and we accept, that he was not lobbied by Mr Bloom or the club.
‘We apologise for the error and for any distress caused and have agreed to make a donation to the Brighton & Hove Albion Foundation.’
We acknowledge the apology and appreciate the correction and significant donation. The Mail has also paid the club’s legal costs.
 
























Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,146
Faversham
Nobby Cybergoat said:
So we sued the Daily Mail ... otherwise they are never going to issue an apology to us

We can expect petty vindictive headlines and coverage henceforth
Click to expand...
f*** 'em, and their squinty-eyed readership.
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,146
Faversham
pocketseagull said:
and this is why Starmer shouldn't be accepting hospitality from the Premier League until at least the Football Governance Bill passes
Click to expand...
The problem is that he can't sit in the regular seats because this would be a security issue. Apparently not all Arsenal season ticket holders are keen Labour supporters, and there may be one or two who would cause a kerfuffle. So he needs to be in a box. But why should he be forced to pay for a box?

Personally I have no more problem with the hospitality any more than I would for a previous Tory leader who is a keen Liverpool supporter. And another former tory PM who is a keen supporter of West Villa.

Having a PM who has to skulk around with a bag over his head and be denied all normal entertainments strikes me as counter productive. I don't want the country run by a miserable sod who spends his life with his sad nose pressed up against a virtual glass window separating him from normal life.

And I suspect many of us would class going to the football as part of normal life ???
 


W

Was not Was

Loitering with intent
Jul 31, 2003
1,607
pocketseagull said:
and this is why Starmer shouldn't be accepting hospitality from the Premier League until at least the Football Governance Bill passes
Click to expand...
What about ministers and backbenchers? Our local MP (Kemptown and Peacehaven constituency), along with plenty other MPs, accepted Taylor Swift tickets from the Premier League.
 






Uh_huh_him

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,132
Harry Wilson's tackle said:
The problem is that he can't sit in the regular seats because this would be a security issue. Apparently not all Arsenal season ticket holders are keen Labour supporters, and there may be one or two who would cause a kerfuffle. So he needs to be in a box. But why should he be forced to pay for a box?

Personally I have no more problem with the hospitality any more than I would for a previous Tory leader who is a keen Liverpool supporter. And another former tory PM who is a keen supporter of West Villa.

Having a PM who has to skulk around with a bag over his head and be denied all normal entertainments strikes me as counter productive. I don't want the country run by a miserable sod who spends his life with his sad nose pressed up against a virtual glass window separating him from normal life.

And I suspect many of us would class going to the football as part of normal life ???
Click to expand...
I get this argument, but then again, he's made a career choice which is massively affecting his ability to live the life he used to.

I don't see it as essential that someone else should pay for him to carry on attending Arsenal games.
It's kind of on him.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,146
Faversham
Uh_huh_him said:
I get this argument, but then again, he's made a career choice which is massively affecting his ability to live the life he used to.

I don't see it as essential that someone else should pay for him to carry on attending Arsenal games.
It's kind of on him.
Click to expand...
Yes, I kind of get that, too.
 




Deadly Danson

Deadly Danson

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Oct 22, 2003
4,613
Brighton
Uh_huh_him said:
I get this argument, but then again, he's made a career choice which is massively affecting his ability to live the life he used to.

I don't see it as essential that someone else should pay for him to carry on attending Arsenal games.
It's kind of on him.
Click to expand...
The problem I have is, it just isn't an issue either way. Who cares? But because the vicious, lying, duplicitous rags decide to make it an issue it then gets reported by the rest of the media who have to have something to talk about so eventually it becomes a "thing". So boring.
 








You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top