portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,689
Prat.
What's he banging on about Palestine for too?
Yes, that struck me as odd too. Might as well have added āArcher Outā for all the relevance it added.
Prat.
What's he banging on about Palestine for too?
Well, exactlyYes, that struck me as odd too. Might as well have added āArcher Outā for all the relevance it added.
Speaking of bellendsā¦..
Yes, you're right. But I was trying to draw a distinction between what he said and the violent actions perpetrated by the other lot over the past week or so. Because they are not equivalent.It's rather worse than saying something daft. You can't be using rhetoric like that whoever you are, let alone an elected official, calling for the murder of one's fellow citizens, regardless of how distasteful one might find their views.
Can you please show where starmer lumped anyone and everyone that has concerns about immigration into far right bucket please? You say it is simply not true. It isnāt. That is why starmer did not say it. He called out the rioters not those at home. I will apologise if you can show where he did that but if you canāt then a) you need to apologise and b) stop spreading lies.
Re housing asylum seekers in hotel (they are not illegal immigrants) - this was on the previous government because they stopped processing applications. Expecting years of inaction to be sorted in a few weeks is ridiculous.
Can someone explain this to me? How are immigrants affording expensive rents ? And wasnāt the argument high levels of immigrants drove down house prices ?Re housing, if we have a housing crisis where rents are high and properties expensive, to suggest the immigration (when running at in excess of 500k pa) isnāt a factor is also ridiculous. t.
Maybe because they are paid by housing benefitCan someone explain this to me? How are immigrants affording expensive rents ? And wasnāt the argument high levels of immigrants drove down house prices ?
Is average Joe in Hartlepool or Sunderland really being out priced in the housing market by immigration ?
As Iām sure you know, the origins of what is left and right wing derives from the Citizens āParliamentā following the French Revolution, the radicals (Jacobins) sat on the left, the conservatives (merchant/bourgeois class) on the right.being anti-immigration is right wing - it just is, that's a definition. having a protest against immigration, descending quickly into violence against police or other targets is extreme or "far" from the middle ground of politics. if you want to stop the label far right being attributed to those concerned about immigration, call out against the mob that turn it violent.
Who are paid housing benefits?Maybe because they are paid by housing benefit
Who are paid housing benefits?
I doubt if Clarkson knows what a hammer or a nail is.This may have already been posted on this thread.
Jeremy Clarkson has hit the nail on the head with his comments in the paper.
But in case youāve missed it, he writesā¦.
āWhen I lived in Londonās Notting Hill, working in the media, I was a remainer and so were all my friends. It literally didnāt occur to us, as we sat down there in our agreeable houses eating agreeable food that someone might vote to leave. And I think the same thing is happening again.
āToday, Iām surrounded by farmers and plasterers and brickies and butchers and all I hear, all day long, is that thereās too much immigration. But if they say this out loud, or if they go on a march, they are told by the London elite that they are far-right extremists or racist thugs. For the most part, theyāre not. They are just people who know that they have to shut up when the Last Post is played and that a cheese rolling down a hill is funny.
āThere was a time youād have called them the salt of the earth. But Sir Starmer doesnāt seem to have grasped this. He is surrounded by people who see nothing wrong with immigration and heās got it into his head ā as I did with Brexit ā that anyone who disagrees with him must be some kind of Trump-nut. The fact is though that four million people voted for Reform. More than that voted for Brexit. And heās p***ing them off by labelling them as modern-day Hitlers. I therefore suggest that both he and his friends at the BBC calm down the rhetoric or we could be heading for some real trouble.ā
Thatās not paying housing benefits.
As Iām sure you know, the origins of what is left and right wing derives from the Citizens āParliamentā following the French Revolution, the radicals (Jacobins) sat on the left, the conservatives (merchant/bourgeois class) on the right.
The modern usage of left and right wing as a mechanism of determining political intent and motive is clumsy at best and misleading at worst, most people have political views that can be conservative (small or no change) and also radical (profound change).
Accordingly, in the original context of what is left or right wing, (and by way of example) Brexit would be left wing, and in the context of people expressing views to restrict immigration, you could argue in current terms an immediate cessation of immigration would be a radical step towards immigration policy and therefore also left wing.
Itās much better to determine intent through political ideology, international Marxism, as an ideology would support open borders for example, and that is essentially what we had with the Tories (despite their rhetoric) and I suspect the Labour Party will follow suit on more transparent ideological plane.
International Marxism sounds more scary than left wing thoughā¦ā¦ā¦.so we will no doubt stay with the simplistic stuff.
The French take to the streets when the government tries to raise the pension age
This is what brings Brits to the streets
Britain is a racist country, more than you would ever think.
We will not find common ground so best leave it here, suffice to say time will tell what motivated this man (now heās 18) and the Gillingham stabbed, however I donāt think Christianity will be in the mix. Iām pretty sure you donāt need to be in a prescribed group to be a terrorist either, especially in the days of online radicalisation, you seem to know more than me.A terrorist incident would mean he was working for a terrorist organisation. That organisation would claim it. It's hardly going to be ISIS if he's a Christian. So how do you think you would describe him differently to the media?
Again, if that's a terrorist attack, the organisation will claim it. Like the 7/7 bombings were terrorist attacks, and reported a such. I'm not sure why you think the media don't say when it's a terrorist attack.
So what do you think it is? If terrorism, who is the organisation?
Huw is a repulsive criminal. He tried to hide his crimes and lied. I'm not sure what your point is there. You're pointing out that criminals lie, but the authorities followed it up, found him guilty, and told us the real truth behind his sorded actions
We do, they are trying to stop the illegal immigration.
You're being silly. If what you said was true we wouldn't have tried to send them to Rwanda.
No, it's the social media influencers who lie and fool people like you who are responsible.
It does seem like an odd choice. What do you think would be a better solution?
No, he's only referring to the current riots. Starmer himself wants to stop the boats.
That's why they typically favour the St George's CrossIf you're a raving British patriot, you would know which way up to hold a Union Flag, Shirley?
View attachment 186725