It's a shame that we are never likely to hit a 30k crowd - even 30,001 would do, but with segregation of fans/no shows on the day I would think we'll always be 800+ shy of the 30,750 capacity.
This.
We are finally just another provincial club with moderately good support. Like Leicester, Southampton, Stoke, Norwich, Ipswich, and so on. All of those clubs have been more successful than we have, and all of them have a ground holding between 27,000 and 32,000 which they fill when playing well but which don't look ridiculously empty for less attractive fixtures.
Therefore 30,750 will do nicely - especially as our ground is better than all of those, right down to smartcards, better pies, comfy seats and asthetics of the stadium. Delusions of grandeur belong down the road at Portsmouth, sorry I mean "lower league Portsmouth".
30,750 will be immense & should serve us for several seasons.
But with the growth of numbers over the years watching sport, and the never ending growth of football, never say never to expansion.
Fellow provincial clubs S'ton, Derby & Leicester have designed their stadia to allow a second tier, despite having smaller pop'n catchments than the Albion.
The A27 flyover & train station/trains would need to be radically improved first.
Not sure on the other clubs but best mate at uni is a derby fan and have watched them play 3 or 4 times this season (including the brighton game).
Dont think we should compare ourselves with derby yet in terms of capacity and attendances.
I know every home game was pretty much sold out this year, but its been a new stadium, promoted last year and we were pushing play offs all year. As well our stadium only held 22,500 odd this year.
Derby get crowds of 28,000+ week in week out, despite being a mid-table team with not much new happening each year. I have my doubts as to wether the albion being in such a progressive position is a sustainable indicator to crowds.
Outside the big cities, I'd say that Derby and Wolves were probably the biggest clubs in the country. For this reason, I left both clubs out of my list of "moderately well supported provincial clubs", as both of those are VERY well supported.Their catchment of Derby & Ilkston, and a few small towns pales into insignificance, compared to the Albion's.
And there are so many other pro clubs in that part of the world.
But the Derby fans are very loyal, and they always get great gates.
Long term, if directed & managed well, the Albion's future has massive potential.
But no hurry; we've only just left the athletics stadium!
Which, spookily would be just a little more than the record crown for the Goldstone! but "safe standing" is only permitted in certain parts of the ground.
I reckon the Southstand could go back quite some way if we really wanted it to. I would like to know why we don't have a massive stand behind one of the goals
Outside the big cities, I'd say that Derby and Wolves were probably the biggest clubs in the country. For this reason, I left both clubs out of my list of "moderately well supported provincial clubs", as both of those are VERY well supported.
Outside the big cities, I'd say that Derby and Wolves were probably the biggest clubs in the country. For this reason, I left both clubs out of my list of "moderately well supported provincial clubs", as both of those are VERY well supported.
But it has to be possible to get a 30,000 gate with ground capacity set at 30,750. Southampton's ground holds 32,300 or something. Pretty much every seat was announced as sold on Saturday and they've had several gates of over 32,000 in the past few years. A ticket exchange would also help when you consider the number of no-show season ticket holders...
You are completely wrong about Wolves. Their ground has been more or less sold out for years, and the reason they averaged 25,500 is because they knocked down one end half way through the season to commence building work, meaning that capacity was restricted to 24,000. And they really aren't competing with Coventry as Coventry is MILES away. In fact it's arguable that they are competing with West Brom as West Bromwich is basically a part of Birmingham (a quarter of the Hawthorns is actually inside Birmingham city limits).Agree on Derby, their support has always been phenomenal, but Wolves, who I agree have big historic attendances, averaged 25,500 this season in a ground that holds a good few thousand more. The population of Wolverhampton itself is 239,000, smaller than Brighton and Hove, and while the West Midlands is a massive population centre, they are competing with West Brom, Coventry and to a lesser extent Walsall for fans in that region, as well as with other midlands teams.
Interesting. No point putting them in if the demand isn't there I suppose.Fair point if you consider there are going to be 30,750 seats.
According to Martin Perry, there aren't. It's the legal capacity for the stadium, not necessarily the number of seats.
Fair point if you consider there are going to be 30,750 seats.
According to Martin Perry, there aren't. It's the legal capacity for the stadium, not necessarily the number of seats.