The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,398
To what? It's on itv.
No access to a TV right now. But thanks all the same.
To what? It's on itv.
As usual !!!
Turned off ITV commentary 30seconds after kick-off.
Radio5 commentary hardly better. Just usual stream of negative comment.
Lawrenson doing his best to counter such ignorant reading of the game (but failing to make much headway).
Radio commentary seems to assume you are watching on telly - if picture off you'd seldom know where the ball was on the pitch.
On the other hand, sometimes does say 'playing from left to right', or 'ball going out on far side of the pitch', which makes you realise from the screen that radio commentators are on the opposite side of the pitch to the main camera viewpoint!
Anyway, as to the match - credit to Stoke for keeping City stuck at nil-nil, throughout first-half, and as I write, well into second half.
Now City are showing signs of frustration, giving away silly free-kicks, clearly Stoke are getting them rattled!
No access to a TV right now. But thanks all the same.
City deserved it really played much better.
City have more, more skilled, players, but don't as a team achieve what they should. Think they 'deserve' to win before they have kicked a ball.
Stoke know they are short of stars, but play together to the full limits of their abilities, right through to the final whistle. No prima donnas.
Did Micah Richards just say "f***ing amazing" ? Followed by Balotelli saying "my season was shit"
Terrible coverage again from ITV.