countrygull
Active member
356-7: already a very creditable score and rising....
Only in the first 130 overs...Man of Harveys said:Am I right in thinking that 399 and over gets maximum batting points?
Or maybe the idea is just to deny Lancs an extra bowling point, although I see no value as it will cost us a batting point.ChapmansThe Saviour said:The right batsmen are in to make sure we get there.
31 required from 4.1.
Within I believe, for both batting and bowling points.BarrelofFun said:Good point. Declare on 8 wickets whatever happens, do you think? Or do they need to get the 9 wickets within 130 overs?
Forget it, no chanceBarrelofFun said:Ah ha. Good - Let's go for it!
26 needed off 15 balls I believe...
There really is no chance with Keedy bowling the 130th over.Man of Harveys said:Forget it, no chance
(well, everyone has been making duff predictions in this thead, I was feeling left out)
Three Arafat cow corners, job done...McShane79 said:17 off 5 balls...