Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Sussex v Wancashire (2nd - 5th Aug)



countrygull

Active member
Jul 22, 2003
1,114
Horsham
356-7: already a very creditable score and rising....
 




Man of Harveys

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
18,801
Brighton, UK
Am I right in thinking that 399 and over gets maximum batting points?
 






Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,457
Brighton
ChapmansThe Saviour said:
The right batsmen are in to make sure we get there.

31 required from 4.1.
Or maybe the idea is just to deny Lancs an extra bowling point, although I see no value as it will cost us a batting point.

:jester:
 






Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,457
Brighton
BarrelofFun said:
Good point. Declare on 8 wickets whatever happens, do you think? Or do they need to get the 9 wickets within 130 overs?
Within I believe, for both batting and bowling points.
 






Man of Harveys

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
18,801
Brighton, UK
BarrelofFun said:
Ah ha. Good - Let's go for it!

26 needed off 15 balls I believe...
Forget it, no chance

(well, everyone has been making duff predictions in this thead, I was feeling left out)
 


Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,457
Brighton
Man of Harveys said:
Forget it, no chance

(well, everyone has been making duff predictions in this thead, I was feeling left out)
There really is no chance with Keedy bowling the 130th over.
 


























bardo

Active member
Jul 6, 2004
720
Seaford
One feature of our batting this season has been depth, right down to the bowlers - Arafat, Mushy and Luke Wright can all score good runs. There's nothing like tail-enders holding the opposition up to really frustrate them. Here's to them then wiping out several early Lancs wickets when they get on to bowl later ...:clap:
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here