Sussex SHARKS v Surrey BROWN CRAPS (T20 Mon)

[Lord Bracknell]

Wright stumped for 31.

71/1

 

[Pevenseagull]

61 off 9 - pleasing progress

Andre 'not nice' Nel 3 over for 11 runs

Git

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Middlesex 148 (19.2/20 ov)
Essex 151/2 (19.0/20 ov)

Essex won by 8 wickets (with 6 balls remaining)

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Prior lbw b Schofield 11

85/2

 

[vegster]

The BBC radio coverage is 9 minutes behind " real time".... ?

 

[vegster]

Prior 5 minutes away from his LBW here

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Goodwin b Walters 38

99/3 off 14 overs

25 needed @ 4.25 an over

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Hamilton-Brown caught by Nel.

105/4

 

[Lord Bracknell]

106/4 off 15 overs

18 needed @ 3.6 an over

 

[Pevenseagull]

making a bit of a meal of this

grrr

 

[Pevenseagull]

Hamilton-Brown caught by Nel.

105/4

did I mention that I HATE Andre Nel

 

[Lord Bracknell]

115/4 off 16 overs

9 needed @ 2.25 an over

 

[Lord Bracknell]

125/4 in the 17th over.

We WIN

 

[Horsham Gull]

does this mean we are through?

 

[Pevenseagull]

splendid

 

[Knightsworld]

125/4 in the 17th over.

We WIN

Thank f***. I just logged into Cricinfo and it had said Surrey won by 2 runs!!

And rest.

 

[CheeseRolls]

Someone will have to explain to me how come the sportinglife website thinks we lost ! These guys are usually reliable on the cricket front

 

[beardy gull]

Someone will have to explain to me how come the sportinglife website thinks we lost ! These guys are usually reliable on the cricket front

...and the beeb. Surrey by 2 runs everywhere you look online.

 

[Marc]

BBC website:

Sussex: 121-4 ( 16.5 overs ) Surrey: 123 ( 20.0 overs )
Close

eh?

 

[Gwylan]

...and the beeb. Surrey by 2 runs everywhere you look online.

Not the beeb. The beeb has the scores and the word "Close",

It certainly is