Spurs v Stoke

[Kinky Gerbil]

Ramos

I doubt it

 

[Stoo82]

"Your getting sacked in the morning, getting sacked in the morning!"

What a game though.

 

[DTES]

Meanwhile, Martin Jol's Hamburg are sitting pretty, top of the Bundesliga...

German League Table

 

[Basil Fawlty]

Well done Stoke. "You're getting sacked in the morning!"

 

[Jam The Man]

Whilst i doubt Spurs would have scored, why did the ref not add on more time for the time spent sorting out the Dawson sending off - was at least another minute...?

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Levy wont sack him as it will mean paying Ramos off and comolli - which he wont.

 

[RM-Taylor]

2-1 to the referee

 

[DTES]

2-1 to the referee

A comment that can only have been written by someone who didn't watch the game. Both penalties were right, both red cards were right...

 

[Frutos]

Well done Stoke. "You're getting sacked in the morning!"

It's hardly original, some fans near me were chanting it at Mark Hughes (albeit slightly tongue in cheek, I suspect) when we beat City.

 

[Spider]

2-1 to the referee

Thought the ref did fine today - the only decision that was wrong was the Spurs goal because Bent was offside.

What a game though!

 

[RM-Taylor]

A comment that can only have been written by someone who didn't watch the game. Both penalties were right, both red cards were right...

I watched it all thanks very much

 

[DTES]

I watched it all thanks very much

Really? So seeing as Spurs' "goal" was offside, how can you claim it was "2-1 to the ref"?

I'm really quite confused.

 

[RM-Taylor]

Really? So seeing as Spurs' "goal" was offside, how can you claim it was "2-1 to the ref"?

I'm really quite confused.

Because of the two ridiculous sending offs

 

[cardboard]

A comment that can only have been written by someone who didn't watch the game. Both penalties were right, both red cards were right...

Correct.....

All major decisions were spot on.
The ref did well today.

 

[Albion Dan]

Really? So seeing as Spurs' "goal" was offside, how can you claim it was "2-1 to the ref"?

I'm really quite confused.

Maybe he means it should have been 2-0 and the 1 for Spurs was only down to the referee?

 

[Zesh Rehman]

I have my sources, to see this fat ****.

Seen TCB's aswell, thats quite a LOL!

what sources? conboy and his brother? your such a gimp

 

[DTES]

Because of the two ridiculous sending offs

I'm not to argue with the point here, because I've just noted that you've started a new thread just on this subject. My views are over there...

 

[Dandyman]

Bad show, Stoke. What sort of team wins against 9 men?

 

[clapham_gull]

Because of the two ridiculous sending offs

Then it's the rules that are wrong, not the decisions.

 

[Jimmy Grimble]

what sources? conboy and his brother? your such a gimp

Done bring me in to this, I know nothing of the sort. I've only just got in and was amazed to see a 6 page thread on Spurs.