Smoking Mothers

[tedebear]

Why are these girls so fcuking thick to get pregnant - that's what i don't understand.

Well I'm fairly up to speed on the facts of life, and I do believe it takes one of you fcuking thick boys to stick your dick in there in the first place - so it ain't all the girls fault?

 

[Napper]

girls should be the ones to ask about protection though

 

[Les Biehn]

Well I'm fairly up to speed on the facts of life, and I do believe it takes one of you fcuking thick boys to stick your dick in there in the first place - so it ain't all the girls fault?

While I agree with what you are saying Tede (I have already posted the same) may I suggest you say a thick boy rather than one of you think boys. We are not all morons.

 

[Les Biehn]

girls should be the ones to ask about protection though

Don't be a twat.

 

[Napper]

Don't be a twat.

well basically mate , the advertising for jonnys etc hasnt worked , and I noticed that Southern fm are now running a campaign to the girls saying "if you want respect" then make them wear a jonny.
Blokes are i would say more irresponsible on this subject

so i'd suggest you is the twat for your response

 

[Les Biehn]

well basically mate , the advertising for jonnys etc hasnt worked , and I noticed that Southern fm are now running a campaign to the girls saying "if you want respect" then make them wear a jonny.
Blokes are i would say more irresponsible on this subject

so i'd suggest you is the twat for your response

Yeah right, I am quite the massive twat because I think the responsibility for birth control is equal between both parties

Well if the great intellectual might of Southern FM thinks that its girls responsibility then so be it, although I'm not even sure thats what they are suggesting.

 

[Napper]

Yeah right, I am quite the massive twat because I think the responsibility for birth control is equal between both parties

Well if the great intellectual might of Southern FM thinks that its girls responsibility then so be it, although I'm not even sure thats what they are suggesting.

missing point , rather than get all moralistic about it , how about we find a way to reduce teenage pregnancys . Targeting geezers hasnt worked , why not target the women with a "respect " campaign.
13 - 16 year old blokes couldnt give a f*** for responsibilty as you put it. Grils may just , and only a may just hit a nerve with

 

[Les Biehn]

missing point , rather than get all moralistic about it , how about we find a way to reduce teenage pregnancys . Targeting geezers hasnt worked , why not target the women with a "respect " campaign.
13 - 16 year old blokes couldnt give a f*** for responsibilty as you put it. Grils may just , and only a may just hit a nerve with

Me missing the point when you say 'girls should be the ones to ask for protection'? I'm not being moralistic you goon, I am being evenhanded and realistic. Both boys and girls should be taught to be responsible for having protected sex, the problem lies with both of them so targeting one is quite negative. To only target girls will make them feel like they are a.Slags and b.The ones carrying the burden while boys can get off scott free.

Both need to be targeted to stop it happening.

 

[tedebear]

While I agree with what you are saying Tede (I have already posted the same) may I suggest you say a thick boy rather than one of you think boys. We are not all morons.

I stand corrected - "a thick boy" - apologies for not generalising Les

 

[Les Biehn]

I stand corrected - "a thick boy" - apologies for not generalising Les

Apologise FOR generalising I think you mean Tede.

 

[tedebear]

girls should be the ones to ask about protection though

No - quite the contrary I think... Do you want a child on your hands at 16? Then don't ask for sex without protection! Works for both boys and girls.... The responsibility is on both sides....

 

[Napper]

Me missing the point when you say 'girls should be the ones to ask for protection'? I'm not being moralistic you goon, I am being evenhanded and realistic. Both boys and girls should be taught to be responsible for having protected sex, the problem lies with both of them so targeting one is quite negative. To only target girls will make them feel like they are a.Slags and b.The ones carrying the burden while boys can get off scott free.

Both need to be targeted to stop it happening.

my initial post was a bit raw , but i do think that whatever they teach at scholls or wherever doesnt work , as the buck stops with the girls (it shouldnt but does) then why not target them .
If your average joe wouldnt get sex unless said bird made him wear a jonny it could indirectly teach said thick guys the way of the world

 

[tedebear]

Apologise FOR generalising I think you mean Tede.

Oops - wrong smilie You got what I meant though...

 

[Les Biehn]

No - quite the contrary I think... Do you want a child on your hands at 16? Then don't ask for sex without protection! Works for both boys and girls.... The responsibility is on both sides....

No no Tede apparently we should make girls feel like they are the only ones with a moral obligation while letting boys swing their unsheathed dicks at any passing female.

 

[Les Biehn]

my initial post was a bit raw , but i do think that whatever they teach at scholls or wherever doesnt work , as the buck stops with the girls (it shouldnt but does) then why not target them .
If your average joe wouldnt get sex unless said bird made him wear a jonny it could indirectly teach said thick guys the way of the world

Why should girls carry the burden of responsibility?

 

[tedebear]

my initial post was a bit raw , but i do think that whatever they teach at scholls or wherever doesnt work , as the buck stops with the girls (it shouldnt but does) then why not target them .
If your average joe wouldnt get sex unless said bird made him wear a jonny it could indirectly teach said thick guys the way of the world

I think that sends the completely wrong message - ie boys can get sex without any concern for anything? Surely you need to ensure your sexual health at 16 or whatever age - so you need to wear a condom? Targeting girls is taking the boys responsibility out of it unfairly.

The advertising is "no condom, no sex" - applicable to both gender!!

 

[Napper]

no point mate , bury head in sand and expect guys to suddenly become all responsible if you like but wont happen. Yes its responsibility of both but read previous posts , I cant be bothered with tittle tattle . You 2 can get on with it

 

[Les Biehn]

Oops - wrong smilie You got what I meant though...

I did indeed, I was just being a bell end

 

[tedebear]

Why should girls carry the burden of responsibility?

Because we're the smarter sex!

 

[Napper]

Why should girls carry the burden of responsibility?

they f ing shouldnt , but they are the one left holding the baby !!!!!