quick sale

[rigton70]

So you are offering them before you, and possibly him, have even taken a 'look' at them?

Brilliant.

he all ready has them bringing one here for me to look at

will post a pic soon

 

[Collar Feeler]

You might be interested in this, not that this thread is likely to be up much longer:

The terms 'knowing' and 'believing' for the purposes of the offence of handling stolen goods under section 22 of the Theft Act 1968, were defined in R v Hall (1985), as:
Knowing
means having actually been told that the goods are stolen, by someone with first hand knowledge, such as the thief or burglar.

Belief
means the state of mind of a person who says to himself that he could not be certain that goods are stolen, but there could be no other reasonable conclusion in the light of all the circumstances.

Knowledge or belief that goods are stolen can be proved by direct evidence from the thief, an admission by the handler or circumstantial evidence such as:
- the low price paid for them;
- the method of storage;
- furtive disposal;
- removal of identifying marks;
- denial of possession;
- possession soon after the theft (sometimes called the doctrine of recent possession);
- a combination of any of the above.
There are also statutory provisions relating to special evidence which could help prove this element of the offence. Also, see R v Elizabeth Forsyth [1997]

 

[Napper]

You might be interested in this, not that this thread is likely to be up much longer:

The terms 'knowing' and 'believing' for the purposes of the offence of handling stolen goods under section 22 of the Theft Act 1968, were defined in R v Hall (1985), as:
Knowing
means having actually been told that the goods are stolen, by someone with first hand knowledge, such as the thief or burglar.

Belief
means the state of mind of a person who says to himself that he could not be certain that goods are stolen, but there could be no other reasonable conclusion in the light of all the circumstances.

Knowledge or belief that goods are stolen can be proved by direct evidence from the thief, an admission by the handler or circumstantial evidence such as:
- the low price paid for them;
- the method of storage;
- furtive disposal;
- removal of identifying marks;
- denial of possession;
- possession soon after the theft (sometimes called the doctrine of recent possession);
- a combination of any of the above.
There are also statutory provisions relating to special evidence which could help prove this element of the offence. Also, see R v Elizabeth Forsyth [1997]

A copper is never off duty

Turn it in mate

 

[Marc1901]

You might be interested in this, not that this thread is likely to be up much longer:

The terms 'knowing' and 'believing' for the purposes of the offence of handling stolen goods under section 22 of the Theft Act 1968, were defined in R v Hall (1985), as:
Knowing
means having actually been told that the goods are stolen, by someone with first hand knowledge, such as the thief or burglar.

Belief
means the state of mind of a person who says to himself that he could not be certain that goods are stolen, but there could be no other reasonable conclusion in the light of all the circumstances.

Knowledge or belief that goods are stolen can be proved by direct evidence from the thief, an admission by the handler or circumstantial evidence such as:
- the low price paid for them;
- the method of storage;
- furtive disposal;
- removal of identifying marks;
- denial of possession;
- possession soon after the theft (sometimes called the doctrine of recent possession);
- a combination of any of the above.
There are also statutory provisions relating to special evidence which could help prove this element of the offence. Also, see R v Elizabeth Forsyth [1997]

You always have to spoil the fun.

 

[Napper]

will have one if it is a genuine working IPAD . Dont care where it comes from

 

[Collar Feeler]

Don't want to see any fellow NSCers get themselves in the shit or indeed NSC being used to further soemone elses criminal activity, An Ipad for £100 is almost certainly stolen or NOT an Ipad

 

[Bozza]

You might be interested in this, not that this thread is likely to be up much longer

Ya think?

I'm in no hurry to remove it - it could be quite interesting!

(Note: I'm not gullible enough to believe this is legit.)

 

[rigton70]

pic to follow soon hes here

 

[Napper]

f***ing coppers make me sick. And this is why they either were bullied or have only copper mates

 

[KneeOn]

Is it possible to reserve one? and pay later in the year?

 

[brunswick]

 

[andy_lee007uk]

Put me down for one if there legit

 

[sir albion]

f***ing coppers make me sick. And this is why they either were bullied or have only copper mates

Maybe he could of gone about it in another way

 

[empire]

1 quid a week u mean

 

[Collar Feeler]

f***ing coppers make me sick. And this is why they either were bullied or have only copper mates

I'm sure you'll see the funny side soon enough.

 

[sam86]

What is a picture going to prove?!

Here's one I took earlier. It's anyones for £25.

 

[Ernest]

There is a con here somewhere

 

[Marc1901]

What is a picture going to prove?!

Here's one I took earlier. It's anyones for £25.

Quite agree with you.

 

[Marc]

i ACUTALLY want one of them, they look amazing!

 

[sam86]

Is it possible to reserve one? and pay later in the year?

Funniest thing I have read in A LONG time.

He's not f***ing Littlewoods.

Brilliant.