No-one has mentioned their goal in their assesment of Kuipers. Naylor refers to it as 'a gift from Kuipers'.
No-one has mentioned their goal in their assesment of Kuipers. Naylor refers to it as 'a gift from Kuipers'.
Gift from Kuipers? I guess it would be either clogs or a windmill, unless he was in a good mood, in which case some hard core pornography, probably involving some slightly overweight East German girls and a bathful of eels.
No-one has mentioned their goal in their assesment of Kuipers. Naylor refers to it as 'a gift from Kuipers'.
DId you know that scientific studies have shown that you can only remember 30% of what happened during the game.
DId you know that scientific studies have shown that you can only remember 30% of what happened during the game.
DId you know that scientific studies have shown that you can only remember 30% of what happened during the game.
Not so hard to believe Jake, Wes, Tommy, Sam, Joe...whoever you may be!
It was more of a point towards some of the marking I've read in this thread
DId you know that scientific studies have shown that you can only remember 30% of what happened during the game.
Not so hard to believe Jake, Wes, Tommy, Sam, Joe...whoever you may be!
It was more of a point towards some of the marking I've read in this thread
Kuipers 5 : had a mad moment in the first half when he wrongly came out of his goal./QUOTE]
I think that's a bit harsh. He forced the player well wide and then immediately retreated when he had defensive cover.
So you are obviously one of the named players then?
Bearing in mind you are supposedly a player...
When you next make a smiley at me please bear in mind the fact that I've paid well over £100 to come and watch you lot play this week!
It was more of a point towards some of the marking I've read in this thread
In fairness, I'm pretty certain the wnker sign was aimed at those giving some of the marks, rather than you.