User removed 4
New member
debatable !who, in turn, are not quite up to the standards of Her Majesty's Royal Marines.
(especially 'K' company.2 troop 42 cdo)
debatable !who, in turn, are not quite up to the standards of Her Majesty's Royal Marines.
(especially 'K' company.2 troop 42 cdo)
Brighton being Brighton, will be interesting to see whether any of the anti-war types try and hang their hats on this.
who, in turn, are not quite up to the standards of Her Majesty's Royal Marines.
(especially 'K' company.2 troop 42 cdo)
Brighton being Brighton, will be interesting to see whether any of the anti-war types try and hang their hats on this.
amalgamated into the PWRR.I thought the Queens (no pun intended) were the Sussex regiment?
That was my initial thought when I read about this in the Argus. I'll be there if I can find time off work.
As much as someone is entitled to protest against a war, they would be protesting against the wrong people. You need to target the Queen, King or Bishop, not the pawns.
2009
[yt]Gn5oU2bVS2U[/yt]
yes mate, long time ago though, came out in 1985