I think its because badgers are really really shit at crossing roads.
Why is it only badgers that seem to be catered for in this way?
If we're trying to emphasise our green credentials, surely we also need to build in several rabbit corridors, a pigeon roost, at least eight hedgehog crossings, two wormeries and an escalator for stoats.
#Why is it only badgers that seem to be catered for in this way?
On the radio now, asking for funding for "Badger Tunnels" to be made payable by the club. Also, loads of Seaguls are going to settlle in the area.
I've written to them, to explain the error of their ways (info@southdownssociety.org.uk, keep it polite!)
Dear John, Jacquetta and all at the South Downs Society,
I feel I must point out that a great deal of your report regarding the final "yes" decision on the community stadium is based on a complete and utter lie, i.e. that the site is virgin downland. If you were to visit the site I'm sure you would realise that it is mostly poor quality monoculture farmland of little or no ecological value. "virgin downland" as you call it, would of course be the birch and oak woodlands that have been largely destroyed since the iron age. The remaining woodlands of this type are mostly on the sharp, north facing scarp slopes such as those adjacent to the village of Ditchling, where farming has never been considered a viable option. The other key, valuable ecosystem is that of the chalk grasslands where sheep have been grazing for thousands of years. Again, none of this ecosystem is to be found at the Falmer site, it is seen mainly on the summits of the downland hills. Any associated tree planting (which is part of the plans) will vastly improve the biodiversity of the site.
I have long enjoyed spending my free time on the open hills, away from the hustle and bustle of town. The Falmer site:
- Lacks public footpath access
- Has no wide-ranging views
- Has no valuable ecosystems
- Is surrounded by a motorway, two smaller roads, a railway and a university.
Also given that the site has long-since been earmarked for development, surely such a use that will benefit the whole community is preferable to a shopping centre?! I hope you will realise how fantastic this stadium will be for the community, work with the club, and then I'm sure many supporters would be supportive of your cause, to protect the truly beautiful parts of the South Downs that areto be included within the national park boundary.
Goodness me. You sound like you really know what you're talking about. Top work!
Zebra crossings?I think its because badgers are really really shit at crossing roads.
I'd like to think so, being a geographist! The thing is, these nimby's haven't got a clue... and it really gets my goat! Anyway, this is why we will win.
Why is it only badgers that seem to be catered for in this way?
If we're trying to emphasise our green credentials, surely we also need to build in several rabbit corridors, a pigeon roost, at least eight hedgehog crossings, two wormeries and an escalator for stoats.
I would like to hereby concur with Mr Notters, and also like to think I am qualified to comment, as a bona-fide ecologist. My degree is actually in 'Countryside Management'. These fuckwits haven't a clue, seriously.
"I personally accept the decision even if I feel it is the wrong one but what
I don't want is a lot of spin covering up what the impact will really be
like. If the club truly want to build the greenest stadium in the land then
I would support them in that aspiration but actions speak louder than words.
The first thing they need to do is reappraise their travel plans and not
rely on shipping so many people in by car.