Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

new stadiums







SeagullTim

Boomer Sooner
Apr 22, 2006
2,591
Brighton
Nou Mestilla

estadio.jpg


Not bad,
 




Robot Chicken

Seriously?
Jul 5, 2003
13,154
Chicken World
But our stadium will "only" hold 22,500, which is tiny compared to the bigger stadia in the Premier League. What exactly is our ambition? After all our ground will only be double the size of Colchester's. We're not even filling in OUR corners either.

And I know we can expand if necessary...
 


drew

Drew
Oct 3, 2006
23,430
Burgess Hill
Trouble with the Goldstone, if you look at an aerial picture it never did look that great, despite some of the great games there, Ipswich in 76, Spurs in 78 and Liverpool in 84 stand out. As for modernizing it, I thought there were too many restrictive covenants in place which prevented building over 50 ft? My concern with Falmer is are there any contingencies in the design to allow for increasing capacity without knocking down one of the sides. 22500 will suit us for the time being but if we are successful and sneak into the premiership (one season should pay off the debt!) then we might need to look for larger capacity. Yes and before anyone jumps down my throat, at the moment this is dreamland but just look at Wigan and Reading.
 




Conkers

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2006
4,560
Haywards Heath
But our stadium will "only" hold 22,500, which is tiny compared to the bigger stadia in the Premier League. What exactly is our ambition? After all our ground will only be double the size of Colchester's. We're not even filling in OUR corners either.

And I know we can expand if necessary...

Madejski Stadium is only 24,000. You could argue they don't have much ambition only allowing for 24,000 but look where they are now.
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,838
Surrey
Cuckoo Farm will be 10,000 capacity?! Talk about lack of ambition!

.
Is it though? How often would Colchester have got more than that in the past 2 years? Ipswich and Southend at home maybe?

Nothing is more soul destroying than playing in a cavernous new stadium with a few thou rattling around inside.

I guess if it's an identikit lego ground, they'd probably expand to 15,000 when they had a bit more money to do so, but surely a 10k ground is better than the 5,500 shed they play in now.
 


Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
I am sure that if you asked the majority of our fans where they enjoyed going as a fan it would be to places like Ashton Gate, Loftus Road and Griffin Park, rather than some of the soul-less new stadia where the atmosphere is as plastic as the fork you eat your meat pie with.

spot on - my two favourite all seater grounds were highbury and hillsbrough
 






Djmiles

Barndoor Holroyd
Dec 1, 2005
12,064
Kitchener, Canada
and they are expanding it to 40,000.

True, but they have managed to survive on 24k the last 2 seasons, which proves that clubs like Brighton could have a good shot at playing in the Premiership even with a relatively small ground.
 








Djmiles

Barndoor Holroyd
Dec 1, 2005
12,064
Kitchener, Canada
Baghdad!:O

baghdad_olympic1.jpg
 


Djmiles

Barndoor Holroyd
Dec 1, 2005
12,064
Kitchener, Canada
Can I be the first to say....WOW! - Indianapolis

stadium_lg.jpg


Lucas_Oil_Field_3-559x351.jpg
 




Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,514
Little harsh on Colchester I think.

Yes, it does give the impression that the design was chosen by sticking a pin randomly into the Ikea Footbol Staadium Katalog

"I'll have the Plopp please, and I'd like it with blue seats, and white trim"

"Certainly, sir, are you sure I can't persuade you to upgrade to the Krapp for only £2 million extra? It has filled-in corners and a Swedish minimalist-style grey corrugated steel surround on which we can customise the trim in a colour of your choice. Blends in seamlessly with the surrounding industrial estate, and very popular at Southampton and Middlesbrough, amongst others"

Col U have had crowds of between 3,000 - 5,000 for years, and there's no reason to suppose that's suddenly going to rocket. Even if their gates went up to 8,000 as a result of the stadium, it still wouldn't justify a bigger place to my mind. They're simply living to their means: besides, who wants to be stuck in a stadium holding 26,000 when only 2,500 people are paying to come in every week, like poor old Darlington? It would be like a graveyard.

No doubt COlchester can expand if the need arises but for now it makes financial sense to have it the size it is.
 




Mr Blobby

New member
Jul 14, 2003
2,632
In a cave
Season tickets for new applicants come in almost £600 for Colchester.

Mmmm I cant see the crowds being high for many matches!

Its £26 for adults in all stands on match days, season tickets are £508 until 1.6.08 for current season ticket holders, £553 for new comers. After 1.6.08 up to £598!

I guess they have to pay for the stadium and Dean hammond somehow! No idea why anyone would buy a full price season ticket as no cheaper then 23x£26, unless you get free cup tickets. Hardly an attractive offer!!
 






Gully

Monkey in a seagull suit.
Apr 24, 2004
16,812
Way out west
The Kassam Stadium is a three-sided wind tunnel.

You are right about that, I went there last season, the ground was about a third full with a crowd of just less than 5k...I reckon that it could hold about 25k if you filled in the corners and built a fourth stand...the thing that struck me was how far from the pitch the stands were, it really is a big ground.

I feel sorry for Queens Park who play in front of a couple of hundred fans...at Hampden Park...that must be the sparsest regular crowd in World football.
 


drew

Drew
Oct 3, 2006
23,430
Burgess Hill
Aren't Colchester taking a big gamble at Cuckoo farm in that once they've built it someother club may move in and force them out!!!
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here