Mutu

[fatboy]

No that Mutu has been sacked, what is next for him?

Personally, I think he will receive quite a lenient period of rehabilitation/ban but after that can he just sign for another club or will Chelsea retain his registration?

I suppose Mr Abramovich can afford to write off £15.8 million and as Mutu did not feature in Mourhino's plans it would be a waste to continue paying him.

He may have to sign for a smaller club on lower wages after his ban. Mutu and Knight up front?

 

[Incredigull]

Will other clubs come sniffing

 

[Incredigull]

 

[Adams score 0]

Dealer.

 

[Meade's Ball]

Mutu Gets The Boot(oo). is my prediction for tomorrow's headlines.

 

[Incredigull]

 

[fatboy]

Mutu Gets The Boot(oo). is my prediction for tomorrow's headlines.

Who nose?

 

[FamilyGuy]

What a W@nker!!!

 

[Marc]

Chelsea wont resign him, he should get a 2 year ban from all forms of footy (but probably wont) as no doubt the authorities will be leniant (sp?) as he's now sacked....it SMACKs of corruption

 

[NMH]

I suppose Mr Abramovich can afford to write off £15.8 million and as Mutu did not feature in Mourhino's plans it would be a waste to continue paying him.

I don't think Abramovich got that rich by cavalier wasting of 15 millions!
I would imagine that Chelsea were still paying another club for his transfer (money rarely changes hands as soon as the player is bought). Also, there must be some sell-on moneys due to Chelsea .

The great thing for them though, is that he was displaying signs of being a troublesome ego, and was walking out due to not being picked for one match.
Rid of a liability? I think they'll be laughing all the way to the bank

 

[CHAPPERS]

I don't blame Chelsea, he really has crossed the line.

 

[D'Angelo Saxon]

Must feel a right charlie

*yawn*

 

[Pavilionaire]

Chelsea can afford to sack somebody and write off £15 million, but it does set quite a worrying precedent, and raises a number of questions.

What would Chelsea do if, say, Veron was found to have taken drugs? Sack him as well and write off a further £15-odd million?

Is it up to the individual club how they treat players who are found guilty of taking similar drugs, or is the sacking option endorsed by the FA?

 

[fatboy]

Chelsea can afford to sack somebody and write off £15 million, but it does set quite a worrying precedent, and raises a number of questions.

What would Chelsea do if, say, Veron was found to have taken drugs? Sack him as well and write off a further £15-odd million?

Is it up to the individual club how they treat players who are found guilty of taking similar drugs, or is the sacking option endorsed by the FA?

I am sure if it was John Terry or Frank Lampard it would be a different situation.

And I am sure Mourinho would not order drugs tests for any of his players other than those he wants to get rid of.

 

[CHAPPERS]

He's breached his contract, no?

 

[Pavilionaire]

Chelsea are entitled to sack Mutu, but is it right to have a drugs policy of "if you're good we'll put you on rehab" and "if you're bad we'll sack you"?

 

[D'Angelo Saxon]

Like Bobby Brown, its their prerogative.

 

[CHAPPERS]

Chelsea are entitled to sack Mutu, but is it right to have a drugs policy of "if you're good we'll put you on rehab" and "if you're bad we'll sack you"?

I think it's different for sportsmen. Surely by taking banned substances they are adversely affecting their ability to carry out their jobs, because they can be banned by an independant body??

 

[NMH]

This gets right up my nose, Mutu deserves a good SMACK !

Maybe he should transfer to Chrystal palace, but he'd probably snort at the idea.

 

[Scarface]

I think that clubs will turn their nose up at him.