glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
I'm happy to believe it's him and I'm happy to believe also that even if it isn't, that Fozzie WOULD HAVE posted that.
Top bloke.
Absolutely
I'm happy to believe it's him and I'm happy to believe also that even if it isn't, that Fozzie WOULD HAVE posted that.
Top bloke.
I think it is, and fair play to him. Fozzie
Withdean Wander, The Complete B****r and the rest should read that before each post they type.
. And yeah, from now on Potter, I don't think you should mention anything slightly critical . Never mind the fact that it's more interesting :
Whoever it is they are right
Is that it? Is that why you guys criticise EVERYTHING all the time? Because its 'interesting' to do so?
No - only berks like you are convincing NSC that we moan about EVERYTHING.
That's frankly not true - only today i've read Badger claim Forster was better than Zamora, and i've posted that i'm PLEASED by Hart's return.
It is/was more interesting posting negative issues, because people tend to debate them - THAT's interesting. Few really are going to question posts that Joel Lynch is quite good, and that Revell's hat-trick on Saturday was great. Yes, it's true - but it's obvious, why does it need stating more than once? And it's not as if i make posts for the sake of it - i only moan about something that i genuinely think NEEDS moaning about.
Sadly, the likes of you are apparently no longer capable of expressing an opinion on negative issues, as you resort to this 'moan too much' tripe that seems to be the latest NSC fad, meaning even expressing negative thoughts no longer makes interesting discussion - i think the popular term is 'binfests'
I've convinced NSC that you moan a lot? That is GOLD, pal.
I saw Badger's claim that Forster is better than Zamora. I then read his very next post in teh same thread where he states 'Zamora is clearly the better player', so I got a bit confused at that point.
I'm perfectly capable of debating a negative issue. Fire away....