yep, brighton definitely got bigger fish to fry than you lot.
spurs really are an irrelevance, you're not even arsenal's number one rivals anymore , its official !
Arsenal no longer loathe Spurs as much, West Ham don't hate Millwall and Chelsea have become the new Man United... | Mail Online
havent seen you for a while sj, where've you been mate ?You should be on Michael McIntyre's comedy roadshow!
starting to hate you ? not really , unlike most chelsea , i hate arsenal more, because i see them as more of a rival, certainly at the moment, and i think your record against us has got more than a little way to go before you become a bogey team, wouldnt you say ?
weve had this argument before, you talk about spurs history and heritage, but its a bit of an emperors new clothes argument, the trophy count even before abramovich was pretty even, weve obviously now overtaken you,just get used to the fact that your best days are behind you, there really is no argument about it.
hang on ive just noticed this, "bigger, more glamorous club "
, when was the last time you walked down tottenam high rd ? LOL , you WERE definitely a bigger club than us, you were NEVER more glamourous than us , the chelsea team of the 70's is the epitome of the glamour club that weve always been known as.
But now YOU'RE cherry picking bits from history. 1970s my arse.hang on ive just noticed this, "bigger, more glamorous club "
There was nothing glamourous about Chelsea in the late 70s through to the mid 90s, when hooliganism took hold, you were getting gates of 8k, often bumbling around in division 2. And your stadium was absolutely shit, except for one stand. Are you forgetting the 15 metres distance from the pitch, the crumbling part closed terracing, the electric fences.
you're obviously forgetting the glamourous players like keith dublin and doug rougvieBut now YOU'RE cherry picking bits from history. 1970s my arse.
Proper glamour. Meanwhile, SPuzz were making do with crowds 3 times bigger, being one of the original big 4 and competing for most cup competitions with regular forays into Europe. Also Spurs have always been a stinking rich club, more so than Chelsea I'd say.
, yeah i know what you mean, but as for spurs always being stinking rich ? are you forgetting irving scholar having to be bailed out by alan sugar ? they were 16 mio in debt, it might seem a trifling sum now, but there was talk of them going bust.
But now YOU'RE cherry picking bits from history. 1970s my arse.
Proper glamour. Meanwhile, SPuzz were making do with crowds 3 times bigger, being one of the original big 4 and competing for most cup competitions with regular forays into Europe. Also Spurs have always been a stinking rich club, more so than Chelsea I'd say.
