Dicker, Navarro, Sparrow, Harley, Forster-Caskey, Vincelot;
I'm sure he was quacking in his boots at the thought of these!
It looks that way, yes.
Dicker, Navarro, Sparrow, Harley, Forster-Caskey, Vincelot;
I'm sure he was quacking in his boots at the thought of these!
Good point. Garvan was a possible replacement in the squad for Elliot Bennett. Wonder what happened to him?
It looks that way, yes.
You signed him from Wolves?
So what? Was he a 'young player'? Did we sell him on?
Your academy didn't produce him though. Big difference.
In the context of this particular discussion it makes f*** all difference whatsoever. So Garvan didn't fancy it, because the player he was replacing wasn't produced by our academy? Riiiight. Good point.
Dicker, Navarro, Sparrow, Harley, Forster-Caskey, Vincelot;
I'm sure he was quacking in his boots at the thought of these!
Palace are now bragging about the fact they had to keep Owen Garvan?
Funny how you left Vicente off that list
Don't take the piss.
He attracted eight fans to the Meet the Players evening.
Actually - it was seven. One turned up to watch the football on the telly.
You obviously haven't read the full thread then. Simster had a dig that we alsways sell our best young talent so i responded that at least we produce young talent. You then brought Bennett into the conversation as if to imply that you produced him...
And Bridcutt
Does that figure include people who had tickets but didn't turn up?Don't take the piss.
He attracted eight fans to the Meet the Players evening.
Actually - it was seven. One turned up to watch the football on the telly.
Two decent players. Give me Williams and Zaha over them anyday though.
Your academy didn't produce him though. Big difference.
He said you sell your best young talent. Nothing about 'producing'. Bennett was our best young talent.