Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Disagree. Demanding an apology is nowhere NEAR "meeting him halfway". An apology is an admission that "ok boss, you were absolutely right and and I was totally in the wrong." It probably wasn't as black and white as that. I was at Southampton and was SHOCKED when I heard Kuipers had been dropped, so it was obviously a shock for him as well. McGhee COULD have gone to the press and said "yes Michels very unhappy at being dropped, but I'd expect that from any of my players. He has to get his head down now, prove me wrong and battle his way back into the team." Instead he goes to the Argus and says "he's not getting back in the team unless he apologises to me". f*** sake, thats just being precious.The Large One said:Asking - alright, demanding - an apology does sound like meeting him halfway. He could have told him to f*** off without giving Kuipers a chance to redeem himself. If McGhee hadn't asked for an apology, it was a strike for Kuipers being able to do what he did and not only get away with it, but be rewarded for it.
Kuipers was obviously genuinely aggrieved, and quite frankly, given the replacements we've had in goal for him, I can't blame the fella. He's not some naive young kid just starting out in the game - he's an experienced member of the squad who'd given us dozens and dozens of top class displays over the years. He deserved better treatment.
Point is, in a situation like that, rightly or wrongly, the manager will often as not come out on top, and Kuipers really ought to be intelligent enough to realise that. Playing for Brighton & Hove Albion is clearly not enough of a pull for Kuipers for him to be able to do what was necessary.