clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,721
I'm only trying to offer some insight into the technicalities that the CPS have been going on about, not to justify it
Well it appears relatively straightforward. The prosecution would have two witnesses (their pathologists) who fundamentally disagreed with each other.
That's the crux of it apparently - the defence would have ripped them apart.
But it shouldn't be forgotten that there is unfortunately much more to this story that the poor mans death.
Last edited: