1)Kung Fu kick a supporter: OK.
2)Miss a drug test: OK.
3)Shag Sister in-law for years: OK.
4)Shag ageing prostitutes:* OK.
5)Refuse to shake someones Hand: Ban for life.
Good point well made. I seem to recall that one of his sons (football agent) was found to be not so squeaky clean as well.
One of his sons is a wife beater.
1)Kung Fu kick a supporter: OK.
1)Kung Fu kick a supporter: OK.
2)Miss a drug test: OK.
3)Shag Sister in-law for years: OK.
4)Shag ageing prostitutes:* OK.
5)Refuse to shake someones Hand: Ban for life.
1)Kung Fu kick a supporter: OK.
2)Miss a drug test: OK.
3)Shag Sister in-law for years: OK.
4)Shag ageing prostitutes:* OK.
5)Refuse to shake someones Hand: Ban for life.
1) Banned for nine months.
2) Banned for eight months.
3) What has that to do with him, or football?
4) See 3) above.
5) 3 week ban for racism, WTF?
1) Banned for nine months.
2) Banned for eight months.
3) What has that to do with him, or football?
4) See 3) above.
5) 3 week ban for racism, WTF?
Thank you for not saying the Roy Keane/Haaland incident, pisses me off when people think Keane ended Haalands career! (Was still a thugish thing to do though)
Not entirely clear what point you're trying to make. The point is that Ferguson has double standards when it comes to respect and morality when it suits him and Manchester Utd.
And none of them were "banned for life", so what is your point other than having your tongue rammed up Utd's massive conglomerate backside?
Thank you for not saying the Roy Keane/Haaland incident, pisses me off when people think Keane ended Haalands career! (Was still a thugish thing to do though)
In the cases put forward here, I can't see how they can be construed as something to lambast AF for.
Not entirely clear what point you're trying to make. The point is that Ferguson has double standards when it comes to respect and morality when it suits him and Manchester Utd.
I think the point is that you have pretty high moral standards yourself if you call on another club to have a played "banned for life£ for merely not shaking someones hand. Would Fergie apply a similar "ban for life" policy on his own players for various acts? It would seem not.
How many more reasons do you need to want to see the back of Suarez in this country? What if he abuses Lua Lua on Sunday? Still happy that he shouldn't be banned for life? Or will an handshake make it all better for you?
Woah there tiger. Just because people are pointing out a certain hypocrisy in Fergies high moral stance about opponents, when he would never accept suggestions of a "ban for life" for any of his players down the years and their various misdemeanours, does NOT equate to condoning Suarez and his actions.
For the record I think Suarez has acted very badly, and Liverpool have made the whole situation worse rather than better. neither player, not club, comes out of this with any credit whatsoever.
It was a Palace fan doesn't this make it ok?