Rangdo
Registered Cider Drinker
Well I was going to reply to him but I think you've covered it much more enigmatically than I ever could.
Thread closed
Thread closed
The Large One said:It's like dealing with a f***ing child, it really is.
2. The club don't want to go to Pende. They want to go to Falmer. The city council has said they can go to Falmer. The government has said they can go to Falmer. They don't want to go to Pende, so they're not f***ing going to Pende.
BUT ... have we got to Falmer yet? NO. Do we have a possible date when we may get to Falmer? NO. Is there significant opposition to Falmer? YES.
THEREFORE ... it is sensible to have a debate about possible alternatives.
5. Now will you please, shut the f*** up, you brainless idiot.
goldstone said:That's a very constructive comment. Probably the way you usually talk to people you disagree with. The sign of a person of well below average intelligence.
Screaming J said:I do know what you mean Goldstone but in TLG's defence Perseus has been banging on about Pende for years; both here and elsewhere. It is rather irritating.
1. You clearly know nothing of the drivel that Perseus has posted on here over the past three years, undermining the Albion's case, possibly with the effect of him personally being responsible for costing the club £60,000.goldstone said:That's a very constructive comment. Probably the way you usually talk to people you disagree with. The sign of a person of well below average intelligence.
Questions 1 and 2 there have no relevance to question 4, so the short answer is NO, of course it's not sensible. Or rather, it's utterly pointless. And the comparison of opposition to Falmer is very small compared to the support for it.goldstone said:BUT ... have we got to Falmer yet? NO. Do we have a possible date when we may get to Falmer? NO. Is there significant opposition to Falmer? YES.
THEREFORE ... it is sensible to have a debate about possible alternatives.