Man of Harveys
Well-known member
They're probably BOTH complete tossers. But Barton's right about those preening tarts.
Last edited:
Redhead said:I think Frank is vastly over rated, He's a long way off being as good as he thinks he is. He scores a lot of goals by virtue of the fact he has 10 shots in a game and hits the target once. He's no longer the best midfielder in the Chelsea team (Ballack is).
His attitude stinks too, the way he talks about West Ham bearing in mind the only reason he got into the team was his dad (when he first broke into the side) He owes them some respect. The way he turned his back on them and all the BS with kissing the Chelsea badge infront of the Bobby Moore Stands shows a total lack of respect.
Frank Lampard =
We agree on something to do with England! Isn't Lampard one of your 'Golden Generation' though?Dick Knights Mumm said:A rare bit of honesty. No wonder he is not popular. As for Fat Frank - the truth always hurts.
DittoSJ's Love Monkey said:I know a couple of Chelsea S/T holders and they would piss themselves laughing at what you said about Ballack being the best midfielder at Stamford Bridge, they can't stand the bloke!!
Probably because they are glory hunting pricks who weren't among the 9,000 who used to have to put up with watching the likes of Dale Jasper and John Bumstead at Stamford Bridge.SJ's Love Monkey said:I know a couple of Chelsea S/T holders and they would piss themselves laughing at what you said about Ballack being the best midfielder at Stamford Bridge, they can't stand the bloke!!
Brovian said:We agree on something to do with England! Isn't Lampard one of your 'Golden Generation' though?
BTW Les Biehn: I've spoken to two mates of mine who are both Chelsea STH's (This was before yesterday). They both said, independantly, that Lampard isn't nearly as good as he thinks he is and it's only the foreign players at Chelsea who make him shine. He IS better than Joe Cole though.
Not my opinions, but easy to believe when you see the way he 'plays' for England.
Brovian said:We agree on something to do with England! Isn't Lampard one of your 'Golden Generation' though?
Simster said:Probably because they are glory hunting pricks who weren't among the 9,000 who used to have to put up with watching the likes of Dale Jasper and John Bumstead at Stamford Bridge.
Chesney Christ said:I don't know any Chelsea STH's (which puts me in the minority on this thread it would seem) but from where I'm looking Joe Cole is a supremely gifted young footballer whereas Frank Lampard is a fairly average, hard working player who has made the absolutely most of his ability and has probably already hit his peak. If your friend is a true Chelsea I don't for the life of me understand why he would have anything against Joe Cole.
I certainly wasn't 'hoping', why do you think that? But I was 'sadly expecting' for reasons I've stated before.Dick Knights Mumm said:Brovian - as you were expecting (or hoping ?) - Fat Frank did play shit in the World Cup. But also remember ............
........ In November 2005 he was named the second best player in Europe, losing out in the European Footballer of the Year awards to the Brazilian midfielder Ronaldinho.
Brovian said:I certainly wasn't 'hoping', why do you think that? But I was 'sadly expecting' for reasons I've stated before.
Chesney: 'One-paced' was one of the comments about JC. And these guys pass the 'old fan' test as they've been going since the 1980s. Again, not my views, I think he's ok. Not world class but competent enough.
Simster said:Probably because they are glory hunting pricks who weren't among the 9,000 who used to have to put up with watching the likes of Dale Jasper and John Bumstead at Stamford Bridge.
Damn straight Ernest dear boy.Ernest said:It needs a few Joey Bartons to take some of these over hyped pricks down a step or 3