didnt they field an illegible player??
Or possibly an ineligible one?
Perhaps he was hard to make out, what with the floodlights failing.
Whilst its obviously a shame for the "romance" of the FA Cup,if it had been Man Utd that had fielded an illegible player,we'd all be going nuts about it.So i guess its fair.
good! their chairman/manager came across as a complete cock...
didnt they field an illegible player??
That would be why his name was writen incorrectly on the teamsheet.
Or perhaps his name was written incorrectly on the teamsheet?
Whilst its obviously a shame for the "romance" of the FA Cup,if it had been Man Utd that had fielded an illegible player,we'd all be going nuts about it.So i guess its fair.
The problem here is that the FA rules make absolutely no sense. As I posted on a previous thread some weeks back, if a player is signed (either on loan or permanently) after the initial game was meant to take place, but before the rescheduled fixture, he cannot play in that game. However if a player receives a ban after the initial game was meant to take place, but before the rescheduled fixture, it applies to that game. How does that even vaguely make sense?