Agree ... legal and lose is uber risky, even a win may do nothing to enhance reputation. Appeal actually becomes a sort of compromise negotiation, particularly agreement to what is said (or more importantly what not said) to the outside world. I've seen stuff written into Compromise agreements that Hans Christian Andersen couldn't have made up
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Dressing Room Activities
- Thread starter seagullwedgee
- Start date
Agree ... legal and lose is uber risky, even a win may do nothing to enhance reputation. Appeal actually becomes a sort of compromise negotiation, particularly agreement to what is said (or more importantly what not said) to the outside world. I've seen stuff written into Compromise agreements that Hans Christian Andersen couldn't have made up
Hillian1
( . ) ( . )
Well I'm still none the wiser so if somebody would like to drop me a pm that would be nice.
done
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
@Hillian1
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
So, in this parallel universe, when the dust has settled, the alternate version of Charlie, who (in that universe) had a strong disagreement with the fiery manager, might be reinstated..
But what if in this parallel universe gus was the aggressive party and charlie thumped him in self defense he could still be reinstated?
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
In reality I've got no idea. I just want this all over and normal bitching about Ashley Barnes to resume.
unlikely even in the parallel universe, I would guess most companies would take a pretty dim view on fighting, provoked or not.
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Tony Bloom's video would suggest that Gus DID know already.
Yes but to give Gus the chance of switch things up and make himself look like the innocent party was hardly a good choice .
ROSM
Well-known member
TBs (excellent) video used the word 'impending' to describe the state of play with Gus' dismissal at the time he was on tv. Which clearly means he was aware.
The club statement used the word 'pending' which would indicate Gus was correct to say he was shocked to see it had been announced.
ROSM
Well-known member
It would of course depend if there was a virtual person in this parallel world who held a strong dislike for the non Charlie. This person would potentially seek to use the anti-matter to bring a new dimension to the proceedings and exact some closing of the vortex.
Meanwhile, back in the real world I'm amazed this thread has been allowed to continue.
Things being said or hinted at are based on rumour and speculation without any solid evidence bring provided to back them up. If none of this proves to be true it runs the risk of damaging the reputation of someone who doesn't currently have the ability to defend himself.
Based on how loyal that person has been to the club, as far as we all know, I think he's owed a little bit more than that don't you?
Things being said or hinted at are based on rumour and speculation without any solid evidence bring provided to back them up. If none of this proves to be true it runs the risk of damaging the reputation of someone who doesn't currently have the ability to defend himself.
Based on how loyal that person has been to the club, as far as we all know, I think he's owed a little bit more than that don't you?
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
True, but if there was an altercation between two people about the attitude of one not caring too much about what had happened after a game and another who was gutted and fuming about it, I'd back the one who lost it because of how much he cared. Maybe I have totally misinterpreted this thread though.
You have not.
I'm not. We are being fed?
IF being the operative word. It's just a personal opinion but until that IF is backed up by something solid I think its a disservice to the individual being indicated here. I'd be the same in that IF that is what happened I'd applaud him but IF its not true then who's to say that they wouldn't be totally horrified at the suggestion and could find such rumours damaging either now or in the future.
I don't know which is kind of my point. These sorts of rumours get picked up online all over the place and reported as fact and trying to disprove something is incredibly difficult to do. The accusation of an employee involved in a physical fight with another employee might not be viewed the same by anyone outside of this board. To believe it doesn't have the potential to damage someone's reputation is naive and in the current situation it strikes me as particulary unfair to possibly tarnish someone just to feed the enjoyment of a few people here.
How about we hold off until we know some facts and debate it then? If it proves to be true we can applaud him then and if it doesn't he doesn't get an undeserved reputation, in either direction.
I don't know which is kind of my point. These sorts of rumours get picked up online all over the place and reported as fact and trying to disprove something is incredibly difficult to do. The accusation of an employee involved in a physical fight with another employee might not be viewed the same by anyone outside of this board. To believe it doesn't have the potential to damage someone's reputation is naive and in the current situation it strikes me as particulary unfair to possibly tarnish someone just to feed the enjoyment of a few people here.
How about we hold off until we know some facts and debate it then? If it proves to be true we can applaud him then and if it doesn't he doesn't get an undeserved reputation, in either direction.