Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Dan Ashworth joins Newcastle







dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
15,989
London
Also surely this is the opportune time for Brighton to tell Newcastle they can't sign any of our players for at least a year. That sounds like a reasonable compromise.

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
 


peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
11,972
Also surely this is the opportune time for Brighton to tell Newcastle they can't sign any of our players for at least a year. That sounds like a reasonable compromise.

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

Come on Everton.... Super Frankie Lampard!
 


Live by the sea

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2016
4,718
Was wondering how much the compensation likely to be if Newcastle want him within the next month or so . I suspect gardening leave at his level is 12 months .
 






Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,618
GOSBTS
Was wondering how much the compensation likely to be if Newcastle want him within the next month or so . I suspect gardening leave at his level is 12 months .

Probably 6 months - which is what he had when we took him from the FA
 










Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
11,821
Interesting - did the FA make him wait (strange as we were hardly a rival) or did we pay a release clause?

We waited, but it's highly likely the option of paying a release clause wasn't there as the FA wanted him to work his notice period to aid transition to the person who took over the role. We've only gone down the gardening leave route to protect the club while trying to get the compensation want out of Newcastle, if they won't pay then we will pay Ashworth to sit at home for his notice period.
 








Mancgull

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2011
5,424
Astley, Manchester
I’m suddenly moving from being disappointed to enjoying the fact that we have Newcastle by the short and curlies on this one. Pay us our compo in full or we don’t release him from his contract. No Dan til beyond the summer transfer window. That must be worth a few million from the Saudis. Enough to fund a very nice replacement.
Don’t mess with us, Newcastle. They already tried to low ball us on Dan B and failed and now they’ll do the same with Dan A.
 


dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
15,989
London
He will have signed his agreement to such a clause upon commencing employment at BHA
Well that's interesting if true (although I'm not sure it's right)

Could that be why he resigned after the transfer window and Dan burn had gone there?

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
 




Neville's Breakfast

Well-known member
May 1, 2016
13,437
Oxton, Birkenhead
Well that's interesting if true (although I'm not sure it's right)

Could that be why he resigned after the transfer window and Dan burn had gone there?

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

Unsure. I don’t know the specifics of his contract but it’s pretty standard to have such a clause when you sign your contract. I certainly had such a clause at a few banks. It banned the hiring of colleagues for six months after my subsequent departure.
 


Creaky

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2013
3,850
Hookwood - Nr Horley
I’m suddenly moving from being disappointed to enjoying the fact that we have Newcastle by the short and curlies on this one. Pay us our compo in full or we don’t release him from his contract. No Dan til beyond the summer transfer window. That must be worth a few million from the Saudis. Enough to fund a very nice replacement.
Don’t mess with us, Newcastle. They already tried to low ball us on Dan B and failed and now they’ll do the same with Dan A.

In practical terms there is nothing TB can do to stop DA from ignoring “gardening leave”. No real penalty that could be directed at him. - if he did and then went to work for Newcastle then they would need to get a “cease and desist” order from the courts which can be a fairly drawn out procedure.

If such an order were ignored that is when it gets serious, (contempt of court). Of course there is no guarantee that such an order would be granted as the judge has to consider whether either side is being unreasonable. Is it reasonable to keep someone away from their normal place of work and at the same time prevent them from working elsewhere despite being offered financial compensation. I wouldn’t like to bet either way on that.
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
54,739
Burgess Hill
In practical terms there is nothing TB can do to stop DA from ignoring “gardening leave”. No real penalty that could be directed at him. - if he did and then went to work for Newcastle then they would need to get a “cease and desist” order from the courts which can be a fairly drawn out procedure.

If such an order were ignored that is when it gets serious, (contempt of court). Of course there is no guarantee that such an order would be granted as the judge has to consider whether either side is being unreasonable. Is it reasonable to keep someone away from their normal place of work and at the same time prevent them from working elsewhere despite being offered financial compensation. I wouldn’t like to bet either way on that.

Practically, he'll be doing some work for Newcastle and everybody knows that.............but Tony is just making things as difficult as possible for them and him - as he's still contracted to us, he can't start there officially, so won't be able to meet (officially) with other clubs, suppliers, agents etc etc nor commit the club in any way (partly why we've been very public in announcing his G/L). It's perfectly reasonable and legal to hold him to his notice period, **** all he can do about that really.
 


Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
13,301
Central Borneo / the Lizard
Is it reasonable to keep someone away from their normal place of work and at the same time prevent them from working elsewhere despite being offered financial compensation. I wouldn’t like to bet either way on that.

Surely thats been tested in the courts already.

Presumably it comes down to whether notice periods are enforceable (I'm sure yes), and whether his job description can be changed to read 'stay at home and do nothing'. As job descriptions do not form part of employment contracts, which generally specify that they can be changed, that shouldn't be an issue. But anyway, the courts will have tested it at some point.
 




Jim in the West

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 13, 2003
4,887
Way out West
In practical terms there is nothing TB can do to stop DA from ignoring “gardening leave”. No real penalty that could be directed at him. - if he did and then went to work for Newcastle then they would need to get a “cease and desist” order from the courts which can be a fairly drawn out procedure.

If such an order were ignored that is when it gets serious, (contempt of court). Of course there is no guarantee that such an order would be granted as the judge has to consider whether either side is being unreasonable. Is it reasonable to keep someone away from their normal place of work and at the same time prevent them from working elsewhere despite being offered financial compensation. I wouldn’t like to bet either way on that.

I guess the thing here is that it is VERY public. Newcastle can't appoint DA until they either pay up, or wait until the end of his notice period (I read somewhere that he could have been on a 12 month rolling contract). BHA will have got good legal advice on this, and I think the issue of "reasonableness" is covered by the fact that NUFC are our direct competitors - it is therefore "reasonable" to have a long notice period, and reasonable for the Albion to hold him to it. Plus, the whole football world will know that DA should be on gardening leave....and I can imagine that pretty much all Premier League clubs would be quite happy to shop DA and NUFC if they try to do anything underhand. Of course, it would be very difficult to stop DA starting work on planning Newcastle's new structure, etc, but I guess what TB really wants is some compensation, and then everyone can move on.
 


Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
11,821
In practical terms there is nothing TB can do to stop DA from ignoring “gardening leave”. No real penalty that could be directed at him. - if he did and then went to work for Newcastle then they would need to get a “cease and desist” order from the courts which can be a fairly drawn out procedure.

If such an order were ignored that is when it gets serious, (contempt of court). Of course there is no guarantee that such an order would be granted as the judge has to consider whether either side is being unreasonable. Is it reasonable to keep someone away from their normal place of work and at the same time prevent them from working elsewhere despite being offered financial compensation. I wouldn’t like to bet either way on that.

While on gardening leave he is still a paid employee of the club, so has to abide by the terms and conditions of the contract he signed. If he was to breach that contract the club would have cause to sue him for the wages they paid him while on gardening leave and he'd also no longer be liable for any bonuses etc due to him. If this was to happen it wouldn't look good for Ashworth personally as it's likely to be played out in public and if it all goes wrong at Newcastle, then would be a stain on his reputation and he'd have to potentially explain these actions in an interview for a future role.

Gardening leave is standard when people in these type of roles leave to go to a rival, across most industries. Dan Ashworth knows that so do Newcastle. It's up to Newcastle to do the right thing and pay the compensation we want if they want him quicker.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here