Brokeback Mountain - today's dilemna

[NMH]

Classic case of pandering to Hollywood's 'industry'. Make a film about the (supposedly) most macho and all-American culture, but make these cowpokes poke each other.

Much of the film industry is gay, so they are BOUND to herald this as a groundbreaking blockbuster for gay pride and gay profile - regardless of whether it holds any intense meaning to it, or not.

I'm sure to be slated as homophobic as usual, but it defies my belief that, with women in this world with all the normal equipment in all the right places, yet some blokes want to put their prodger into another man's vent where his body disposes of stinking waste product.

There's something intrinsically wrong with homosexuality, and a film that glorifies the 'loving' aspect is just bogus (imo).

 

[Hungry Joe]

Classic case of pandering to Hollywood's 'industry'. Make a film about the (supposedly) most macho and all-American culture, but make these cowpokes poke each other.

Much of the film industry is gay, so they are BOUND to herald this as a groundbreaking blockbuster for gay pride and gay profile - regardless of whether it holds any intense meaning to it, or not.

I'm sure to be slated as homophobic as usual, but it defies my belief that, with women in this world with all the normal equipment in all the right places, yet some blokes want to put their prodger into another man's vent where his body disposes of stinking waste product.

There's something intrinsically wrong with homosexuality, and a film that glorifies the 'loving' aspect is just bogus (imo).

There's something intrinsically wrong with you pal.

 

[Skaville]

I'm sure to be slated as homophobic as usual

Yep, you homophobic TWAT.

 

[chez]

Classic case of pandering to Hollywood's 'industry'. Make a film about the (supposedly) most macho and all-American culture, but make these cowpokes poke each other.

Much of the film industry is gay, so they are BOUND to herald this as a groundbreaking blockbuster for gay pride and gay profile - regardless of whether it holds any intense meaning to it, or not.

I'm sure to be slated as homophobic as usual, but it defies my belief that, with women in this world with all the normal equipment in all the right places, yet some blokes want to put their prodger into another man's vent where his body disposes of stinking waste product.

There's something intrinsically wrong with homosexuality, and a film that glorifies the 'loving' aspect is just bogus (imo).

Well said, some sense finally. And BTW everyone, just coz some people realise that being a faggot is wrong it doesnt mean that they are twats - personally I think the people who think its OK for one bloke to stick his knob up another bloke arse are the twats.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

I was having a pop at the hard men of NSC, Chappers , its called irony, look it up.

But why would hard men not go when the film is about hard men?

 

[B.M.F]

Well said, some sense finally. And BTW everyone, just coz some people realise that being a faggot is wrong it doesnt mean that they are twats - personally I think the people who think its OK for one bloke to stick his knob up another bloke arse are the twats.

Does that mean you are a taker and not a giver chez

have to agree. I don't mind if they want to do it to each other as it is up to them. It is just that personaly the thought of 2 blokes bumming is enough to make me sick. Saying that I can not be homophobic as I have loads of films of girl on girl action

 

[NMH]

There's something intrinsically wrong with you pal.

Summat RIGHT about nature's arrangement, where penis enters vagina for procreation. Without it, even the woofters wouldn't even be here!

Here's to hetero sex!

 

[Skaville]

How many of you homophobes have had anal sex with a woman?

 

[Brixton Seagull 2]

I thought it was a brilliant film, and anyone who is scared of going to see it is a big fat poof themselves.
It's nothing like Philadelphia (which was shite), and there's no graphic "cock in mangina" for the squeamish.

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

A Brilliant film, easy to see why it is up for so many awards. I cannot think of one area where it fails.

 

[Lokki 7]

There's something intrinsically wrong with homosexuality, and a film that glorifies the 'loving' aspect is just bogus (imo).

Define "wrong". There are many cases of homosexuality in animals, it is natural and it is common. Its not my cup of tea but I don't see how anyone can judge it to be wrong. As for the loving aspect being bogus, I really do pity you.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

NMH - methinks you protest too much, maybe you are supressing your latent homosexuality. Fancy a shag

 

[chez]

NMH - methinks you protest too much, maybe you are supressing your latent homosexuality. Fancy a shag

 

[Pavilionaire]

I'll be buggered if I'm going to watch that drivel.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

Don't worry mate I prefer to pot the easy Pink not the difficult Brown.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

I'll be buggered if I'm going to watch that drivel.

 

[Pavilionaire]

Just you wait for the sequel, when Heather Ledger and his chum rounds up a posse of five for a Grand Canyon gangbang, working title "The Magnificent Seven: Ride 'Em Cowboy".

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Im seeing underworld tonight, looks ok

 

[Grendel]

Would this film have won any awards if it was about a cowboy and a cowgirl? Probably not, but because it's got queers in it the film industry fawns all over it. The whole thing strikes me as a cheap way to gain publicity for a film that would ordinarily have passed people by.